Posted 2008-July-01, 18:56
Playing fauirly basic methods, I'd transfer like suggested, and then bid 3♦, like suggested, and then pass 3NT. I just showed 5-5, presumably, and partner opted NT. I respect that, especially with two stiff knavves as kickers. If 6minor was on, partner might have stepped out somewhere along the way.
If I assume no four-suit transfers (assuming this was optional), then I'll assume three-suit transfers and bid 2♠. When partner bids 3♣, I'll bid 3NT. Partner will assume that I have a minor and concern about 3NT. If he corrects 3NT to 4♣, I'll bid 4NT to make him choose the minor. If he takes that as BW, I'll hope for 0 or 1, or I'll hope for a WAG slam to make, or I'll bid 5♠ and expect him to correct to 5NT.
However, I'd rather have better methods.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.