BBO Discussion Forums: what would you be in and where should you be - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

what would you be in and where should you be and how would you get there

#1 User is offline   sceptic 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,343
  • Joined: 2004-January-03

Posted 2008-June-29, 01:33


Scoring: IMP


West North East South

 -     -     -     1
 Pass  1    3    4
 Pass  4NT   Pass  5
 Pass  5NT   Pass  7
 Pass  Pass  Pass  

0

#2 User is offline   mr1303 

  • Admirer of Walter the Walrus
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,570
  • Joined: 2003-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.

Posted 2008-June-29, 01:49

I want to be in 7NT, as I have 13 top tricks in 7NT.

How you get there of course is another matter.
0

#3 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,907
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-June-29, 10:22

Hi,

The bidding was fine, but North should have
checked for the Queen of hearts.
North knows, that the partnership will have
only a 8 card trump fit.
And if you miss the Queen, the Grand will be
on a finesse.

Another possible improvement would be 7C,
instead of 7H, South showed astrong hand,
but partner does not know about the strong
6 card suit.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#4 User is offline   ArcLight 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,341
  • Joined: 2004-July-02
  • Location:Millburn, New Jersey
  • Interests:Rowing. Wargaming. Military history.

Posted 2008-June-29, 10:56

I dont think the bidding was fine.

Why was 1 not the response by North?

If playing Walsh responses to 1, then 1 is bypassed in favor of a 4 card major with non GF hands.
North has a monster so should respond 1 then later can show his hearts. That will let opener know responder has a big hand.
0

#5 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2008-June-29, 11:33

Obviously you want to be in 7NT.

South's last action was an error. If he is going to bid 7 he might as well bid 7 on the way. Now North might either pass or bid 7NT rather than 7. Of course, 7 is in jeopardy due to the opening heart ruff.

Just as obviously North should have asked about the Q for grand slam purposes. However, his failure to do so could have saved the partnership by getting South to bid the grand in something other than hearts. If North asks about the Q and finds out that it is missing, the partnership will get to 6 which will only make if declarer guesses which way to play the first round of hearts.
0

#6 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,907
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-June-29, 12:13

ArcLight, on Jun 29 2008, 11:56 AM, said:

I dont think the bidding was fine.

Why was 1 not the response by North?

<snip>

A matter of partnership agreement.
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#7 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2008-June-29, 12:44

ArtK78, on Jun 29 2008, 06:33 PM, said:

6 which will only make if declarer guesses which way to play the first round of hearts.

Given East's 3 bid, declarer would play the hearts the right way around.

In an uncontested auction on a non-club lead, there is a safety play against 5-0 hearts - take a first-round finesse into the hand that was on lead. That guards against Qxxxx in either hand, and loses only if they can win and take a ruff. The point of finessing into the hand that was on lead is that you'll suffer a club ruff only if the other hand omitted to make a Lightner Double.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#8 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-June-29, 13:43

ArcLight, on Jun 29 2008, 11:56 AM, said:

I dont think the bidding was fine.

Why was 1 not the response by North?

If playing Walsh responses to 1, then 1 is bypassed in favor of a 4 card major with non GF hands.
North has a monster so should respond 1 then later can show his hearts. That will let opener know responder has a big hand.

Walsh reverses show 5/4M.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#9 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-June-29, 14:01

The auction was decent up through 5.

My guess is that North was afraid 5 would be passed with three (apparently playing 1430). If North asks for the heart Queen, South bids 6.

North now must do his homework. south is known to have something like:

Ax(x) A10xx x(x...) A(x...)

A 12-count ain't enough for a 4 call. Opener cannot have anything more than the Aces in the majors, it seems. He must have extra club length. As north can count five tricks outside of hearts and clubs, there are no outside losers.

A mere fifth club take away one of the heart losers, and a sixth club takes away a second heart loser. So, 6NT seems vastly superior to 6.

But, North should think even harder. If Opener has solid clubs, sixth, then 7NT should make. North can count seven tricks in the majors and diamonds, so the grand turns on the quality and length of the clubs.

If South had something like Axx Axxx x AQxxx, he might be kind of boxed into a 4 call. With one fewer spade and one more club, that's a solid 4 call but still not enough for the grand.

So, North needs something like the actual hand for the grand, which is a fairly strong hand, but very plausible.

So, let's suppose North pushes this to 6NT but takes a stab at the grand by cuebidding 6, kind of a LTTC grand try.

With the actual hand, South would have no problem with what to do. The question for North would be whether South would move with solid but one fewer club or six clubs but not solid. Well, both should be on somewhat the same page. North seems to have an agenda that involve ditching slow heart losers. That obviously is in the form of the AKQ of diamonds. With grand interest, North needs the heart King as well. If North also holds the club King and the spade King, that's a huge hand. So, South should be somewhat conservative in accepting such a move.

This, of course, all boils down to partnership trust and understanding, but I think some would get to the grand after the auction up through 5, a queen ask, a 6 call, and a clever 6 call on route to the clear notrump conversion.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users