BBO Discussion Forums: MALEX again - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

MALEX again

#1 User is offline   kes 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 42
  • Joined: 2006-September-03

Posted 2008-June-28, 06:54

The bidding system MALEX (Major's Length Exact) has these opening bids :

1C each hand with 14 P (and some with 13 P)

Rule of 18 up to 13 P :
1D with 4= Hearts & 0-3 Spades - not 3433 , may have a longer minor
1H with 4= Spades & 0-3 Hearts - not 4333 , may have a longer minor
1S with 4+ Hearts & 4+ Spades

With 9 - 13 P :
2C with 5= Hearts & 0-3 Spades
2D with 5= Spades & 0-3 Hearts
2H with 6+ Hearts & 0-3 Spades
2S with 6+ Spades & 0-3 Hearts

With 11 - 13 P :
1N semi-balanced (4432 , 5422 , 5332 , 6322) , no 4card Major (and not 4333)
2N with 5+ Clubs & 4+ Diamonds
3m with 6+ cards

Pass up to 13 P (good 13 are always 14) with 4333
and with 31 Majors & 5= Diamonds & 4= Clubs - no place to open , sorry


The system works fine , at least to us non-top-player
- konstructive advices are welcome

KES - still trying to re-invent the wheel
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-June-28, 07:19

14 hcp for strong is too weak.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   effervesce 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 885
  • Joined: 2007-March-28

Posted 2008-June-28, 07:19

Having tinkered with openings similar to what you have (but from a suspensor forcing pass basis):

The main defect of your system is that you really lose out big on minor hands. Opening 2NT or higher with such hands will be the biggest losers in such a system, and is a very large hole imo.

Yes, you can play it-but I think you'd do better with a standard system than with MALEX.

That said, the idea is sound- have you looked at MOSCITO forcing pass/strong club systems?
Ming

--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
0

#4 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2008-June-29, 04:01

I have played systems that used 1 and 1 artificial.

One of my experinces was, that these openings worked much better than expected:

2 = 5+ clubs, 4+ diamonds
2 = 5+diamonds, 4+ clubs

These bid take a lot of strain from the one-level minor-openers. The more exact their point range is, the better they work, but of course then they take less strain of the openings.

At a glance it seems that we start the bidding uncomfterbly high, but responder will often know the right strain immidiately, and will only have to check for strenght.

It is, of course, not a perfect solution, but if you want to free 1 and 1, I found these to be very usefull.

I recommend playing penalty doubles over opponents interference. (When you have showed nine specific cards, the need for takeout is infrequent.)
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.


Gnasher
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users