BBO Discussion Forums: Canny Hacket - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Canny Hacket canna hack it?

#1 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2008-June-20, 10:08

Scoring: IMP

European Open Championships
England v Czech Republic
Hands rotated to make declarer South
(_P) _P (_P) 1N
(_P) 2 (_P) 2
(_P) 2N (_P) 3
(_P) 4 AP
LHO leads K 2 5 A
You lead 7 J 4 6
LHO switches to 7 8 A 3
RHO returns 2 K T 5
The Hackett twins spear-head the English fight back :( and are doing well on the Butler :) In the other room the contract was 2= but typical gutsy bidding got the brothers to a pushy game :). Unfortunately, declarer didn't exploit a subtle extra chance spotted by commentator David Burn. :lol:

0

#2 User is offline   xcurt 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 612
  • Joined: 2007-December-31
  • Location:Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Posted 2008-June-20, 19:51

nige1, on Jun 20 2008, 11:08 AM, said:

Scoring: IMP

European Open Championships
England v Czech Republic
Hands rotated to make declarer South
(_P) _P (_P) 1N
(_P) 2 (_P) 2
(_P) 2N (_P) 3
(_P) 4 AP
LHO leads K 2 5 A
You lead 7 J 4 6
LHO switches to 7 8 A 3
RHO returns 2 K T 5
The Hackett twins spear-head the English fight back :) and are doing well on the Butler :). In the other room the contract was 2= but typical gutsy bidding got the brothers to a pushy game :P. Unfortunately, declarer didn't exploit a subtle extra chance spotted by commentator David Burn. :P

Did LHO have xxx, Qxx, KQJx, Jxx?*

* SA, CQ->K-A, C ruff, now D ruff with RHO failing, C ruff felling the J, S finesse, SK pitching diamond, CT pitching diamond.

This timing loses to LHO having DKQJ and the CK and the HQ. Might he have passed that red/red? Would help to know the opponents here
"It is not enough to be a good player. You must also play well." -- Tarrasch
0

#3 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2008-June-21, 05:04

xcurt, on Jun 20 2008, 08:51 PM, said:

Did LHO have xxx, Qxx, KQJx, Jxx?
...
Would help to know the opponents here

LHO is Jacub Slemr, RHO is David Vozabal. Declarer relied on a 3-3 diamond break that failed to materialise :P
David Burn's suggestion is quite simple but rather pretty :)
It caters for LHO having 3 diamonds, for example
QTxx QTx KQJ Kxx
It also succeeds against xcurt's example hand and LHO's actual hand:
xxx QTx KQJx Kxx
Futhermore it can succeed against other LHO hands such as
xxx Tx KQJx KJxx
0

#4 User is offline   xcurt 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 612
  • Joined: 2007-December-31
  • Location:Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Posted 2008-June-21, 13:38

nige1, on Jun 21 2008, 06:04 AM, said:

xxx QTx KQJx Kxx

Declarer can succeed on an elopement against the actual hand.

CA, C ruff, D ruff, now if the diamonds didn't split, C ruff, 3 rounds of spades and then another black card makes dummy's last trump.
"It is not enough to be a good player. You must also play well." -- Tarrasch
0

#5 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2008-June-21, 15:13

Well done XCurt :) the recommended play is
K, A, ruff, ruff.
If are 3-3 then claim. Otherwise:
ruff, A, finesse J, K, or ruff
This effects a coup en passant against LHO when he holds
xxx QTx KQJx Jxx
or his actual hand:
xxx QTx KQJx Kxx
but it also effects a pretty elopement when LHO has say
xxx Tx KQJx KJxx
In the latter case, when declarer ruffs the 3rd in hand, RHO can discard a black suit; but he must follow suit when declarer ruffs the other black suit in dummy, at trick 12!
0

#6 User is offline   xcurt 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 612
  • Joined: 2007-December-31
  • Location:Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Posted 2008-June-21, 20:13

nige1, on Jun 21 2008, 04:13 PM, said:

Well done XCurt :) the recommended play is

Well I didn't get it the first time either. I'll take some consolation in the Hackett twin missing the same play. Well done to ENGLAND slipping in at the wire too and good luck to your lads in RR2.
"It is not enough to be a good player. You must also play well." -- Tarrasch
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users