BBO Discussion Forums: Cavendish. Now. - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Cavendish. Now.

#1 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-May-09, 17:51

For those who don't know, there is Cavendish pairs on BBO vugraph right now. Only two forum regulars playing but lots of action and 1.2 million dollars raised in the auction. Come watch!
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#2 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-May-09, 19:00

This thread is going to lose steam fast...
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#3 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-May-09, 21:35

i hate life.
0

#4 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2008-May-09, 22:17

So how much did the favored team have to put into the side pool?

I've always wanted to be invited to the Cavendish, but I've also wondered how much it would set me back...not, of course, that I would be favored if I went in even with five pros.
0

#5 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-May-09, 23:17

It's a pair game. Helgemo-Helness went for 73000 I think and I also think they have to pay 25% or 20% themselves. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#6 User is offline   Mbodell 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,871
  • Joined: 2007-April-22
  • Location:Santa Clara, CA

Posted 2008-May-10, 04:24

I thought the way it went was each pair had to bid 12,500 for themselves an if no one bids on them they are liable for the full amount. If someone bids on them then I thought they didn't need to pay anything into the pool but are eligible for only a very small slice of it. But maybe one of the 2 forum regulars who played could clear it up.
0

#7 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-May-10, 12:53

It's correct that they have to pay 12,500 if nobody bids on them. They do have to pay if they get bid on, and the more they sell for the more they have to pay.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#8 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2008-May-10, 13:25

han, on May 10 2008, 01:53 PM, said:

It's correct that they have to pay 12,500 if nobody bids on them. They do have to pay if they get bid on, and the more they sell for the more they have to pay.

I think they must take at least 10% of themselves and can demand no more than 50%.
0

#9 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-May-10, 16:35

it's 10-40
0

#10 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2008-May-10, 23:08

Wow. That's a whole lotta dough.

So how much was the high bid? Was it the $73K?
0

#11 User is offline   Mbodell 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,871
  • Joined: 2007-April-22
  • Location:Santa Clara, CA

Posted 2008-May-11, 01:14

Yes, that was the high bid. If you go to the cavendish web site at http://www.cavendishinvitational.com/ you will see the auction and the amounts and the prizes. Note that 10% of the top bid is still less than $12,500 so you never need to pay more than that and it is the unbid pairs who are most hard done by in terms of out of pocket mandatory expenses.
0

#12 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-May-11, 01:31

Even the pairs that are not bid on might be able to get other people to buy a part of them.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#13 User is offline   brianshark 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 2006-May-13
  • Location:Dublin
  • Interests:Artificial Intelligence, Computer Games, Satire, Football, Rugby... and Bridge I suppose.

Posted 2008-May-11, 06:51

I haven't been able to access the cavendish website since it started. the connection keeps timing out. In fact, I don't think I could last year either. Is anyone else having the same problem?
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
0

#14 User is offline   hotShot 

  • Axxx Axx Axx Axx
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,976
  • Joined: 2003-August-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-May-11, 07:14

NO problem to reach the site from here.
0

#15 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2008-May-11, 07:35

brianshark, on May 11 2008, 07:51 AM, said:

I haven't been able to access the cavendish website since it started. the connection keeps timing out. In fact, I don't think I could last year either. Is anyone else having the same problem?

I've experienced a few timeout errors. Usually right after the link is provided during the vugraph presentation.
0

#16 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2008-May-11, 11:35

Mbodell, on May 11 2008, 02:14 AM, said:

Note that 10% of the top bid is still less than $12,500 so you never need to pay more than that and it is the unbid pairs who are most hard done by in terms of out of pocket mandatory expenses.

Which was almost a third of all pairs, and includes lots of names I recognize. Gulp.

Hey, I know I'm not even close to an invite, but it's still fun to dream. Now I'm going to have to dream about coming up with the money first...
0

#17 User is offline   glen 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,637
  • Joined: 2003-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa, Canada
  • Interests:Military history, WW II wargames

Posted 2008-May-12, 11:37

One has to admire Rodwell's Business Continuity Plan - he now has a great partner that can play the RM Club to win the big $ events and still call "Jeff".

I've wondered if Hamman will be 100% comfortable playing the weak NT/five card majors favored by Zia and their koach. Perhaps the Nickell formation could have been Rodwell+Hampson, Hamman+Meckstroth?

Thanks to World Bridge Productions, BBO, and the commentators for an excellent vugraph.
'I hit my peak at seven' Taylor Swift
0

#18 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2008-May-12, 11:46

officeglen, on May 12 2008, 01:37 PM, said:

One has to admire Rodwell's Business Continuity Plan - he now has a great partner that can play the RM Club to win the big $ events and still call "Jeff".


Why doesnt he play with Meckstroth?
0

#19 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,724
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2008-May-12, 12:05

Apollo81, on May 12 2008, 08:46 PM, said:

officeglen, on May 12 2008, 01:37 PM, said:

One has to admire Rodwell's Business Continuity Plan - he now has a great partner that can play the RM Club to win the big $ events and still call "Jeff".


Why doesnt he play with Meckstroth?

My understanding (based on past year''s discussions) is that its a combination of factors

1. If R+M were playing together they'd command a very high price. Associated with this, they be required to spend a chunk of their own money to purchase some fraction of their sales price. Auctions have some very perverse incentives built in... One important one is that the winning bidder will (very often) over pay for the the asset in question. This creates a clear incentive for top pairs to find ways to artificially depress their going price

2. R+M might need to make substantial changes to their methods to play in the Cavendish. I've heard that they prefer not to play in events that would force them to modify their methods...
Alderaan delenda est
0

#20 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-May-12, 14:42

Weinstein, the guy whos won the event 5 times, says as a professional gambler he cannot justify playing in the cavendish anymore at this point (not that he'll stop, just that he goes for so high its a bad bet). Can you imagine if meckwell played together how high they would go for?
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users