BBO Discussion Forums: What's going on? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What's going on?

#1 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2008-May-06, 10:41

Scoring: XIMP

1♦-(2♣)-2♥-(P)
2♠ - (P) - 3♥ - (P)
3♠ - (P) - ?


(1) Do you agree with the 2♥ call?
(2) Do you agree with the 3♥ call?
(3) What do you do over 3♠?
0

#2 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-May-06, 10:42

No, yes, 4S.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#3 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-May-06, 10:56

han, on May 6 2008, 08:42 AM, said:

No, yes, 4S.

What he said.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#4 User is offline   hotShot 

  • Axxx Axx Axx Axx
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,976
  • Joined: 2003-August-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-May-06, 11:12

yes, no, 4♠
0

#5 User is offline   zasanya 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 747
  • Joined: 2003-December-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thane,Mumbai,Maharashtra,India
  • Interests:Chess,Scrabble,Bridge

Posted 2008-May-06, 11:21

(1)Some of my friends play negative free bids.With them yes; with others no.
(2)Yes
(3)4♠
Aniruddha
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius".
0

#6 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-May-06, 11:46

no yes 4♠, but the first no is very close
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#7 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-May-06, 11:54

It's fine so far. Now 4♠.
0

#8 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2008-May-06, 12:06

gwnn, on May 6 2008, 12:46 PM, said:

no yes 4♠, but the first no is very close

Agreed and noting that the 2♣ overcall of 1♦ is a nuisance !
0

#9 User is offline   blewah 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 2008-March-23

Posted 2008-May-06, 17:41

Playing Neg Free Bid:
1) 2♥ (Yes)
2) 3♥ (Yes)
3) 4♠

Not playing NFB:
1) DBL
2) 3♥ (Though N may bid 3♠ directly with 6-5, skipping this round)
3) 4♠
0

#10 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2008-May-07, 06:30

OK. It seems that most of you have arrived at 4♠ on this hand one way or another.

Here is the entire hand. Assign the blame:

Scoring: XIMP

1♦ - (2♣) - 2♥ - (P)
2♠ - (P) - 3♥ - (P)
3♠ - All Pass

0

#11 User is offline   hotShot 

  • Axxx Axx Axx Axx
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,976
  • Joined: 2003-August-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-May-07, 06:40

What blame?
I don't mind not to be playing 6♠.

Both player have shortness opposite partners longest suit, and there is no need to be in every 23 HCP slam. And after a ♣ lead, it's not even a good one.

But seriously: South showed a 6-5 distribution with a strong hand. He can't have more than 2 loser in ♥ and ♣ and North is covering a possible ♥ loser. North single in ♦ must be helpful to establish partners ♦ suit and limits loser in this suit to one. And South is covering a trump loser by holding the ♠Q. How many loser can South have holding a 6-5 distribution with (more than) opening strength?

100% North for missing game.
0

#12 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-May-07, 07:18

blame for missing game.

Anyway, I think North shouldn't need to be ashamed of his slight overbid of 2♥. In support of spades, he's got a good hand, certainly worth the playing strength announced with 2♥. A raise to 4 is normal.
0

#13 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-May-07, 07:22

I like stretching to bid the 6 card suit, but this one was too much of a stretch. If you made it a little bit better I would agree though. 1-3 in the minors is really not good. That being said, I slightly prefer Xing to passing (even though I generally hate Xing with this hand type). I would probably rank them X>pass>2H.

3H is pretty much forced since there's no other option, and 4S is clear since partner has shown 5-6.
0

#14 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-May-07, 07:23

ArtK78, on May 7 2008, 07:30 AM, said:

OK.  It seems that most of you have arrived at 4♠ on this hand one way or another.

Here is the entire hand.  Assign the blame:

Dealer: South
Vul: None
Scoring: XIMP
♠ Qxx
♥ AJxxxx
♦ x
♣ 98x
♠ AJT98
♥  
♦ AQJxxx
♣ Ax
1♦ - (2♣) - 2♥ - (P)
2♠ - (P) - 3♥ - (P)
3♠ - All Pass

Well north passed a forcing bid so I guess I'd blame him! Having made the overbid of 2H it is absolutely horrible to then pass a forcing bid. If north is going to bid like this he should just quit overbidding. And it's not like north even had a bad hand for this auction, he had 3 trumps to an honor, an ace, and a stiff! WTF?
0

#15 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2008-May-07, 07:42

OK. I was South. I thought that my bids were forcing, but my partner obviously thought differently.
0

#16 User is offline   keylime 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: FD TEAM
  • Posts: 2,735
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nashville, TN
  • Interests:Motorsports, cricket, disc golf, and of course - bridge. :-)

Posted 2008-May-07, 12:51

If one held the QH as well as the hand, I bid 2H.

Instead I like the double, freebid of hearts, raise of spades concept.
"Champions aren't made in gyms, champions are made from something they have deep inside them - a desire, a dream, a vision. They have to have last-minute stamina, they have to be a little faster, they have to have the skill and the will. But the will must be stronger than the skill. " - M. Ali
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users