Partner has gone crazy (twice)
#1
Posted 2008-May-06, 05:05
1. IMPs, favourable, you hold:
♠A962 ♥AJ74 ♦ AK87 ♣T
You are playing strong, 5, and a polish 1♣ (which includes all hands with 15+ pts and 5+ clubs (unbalanced) or any hand with 18+ pts). 2♣ would be precision style. We don't play namyats if it matters.
Partner deals and opens 6♣s, RHO passes, your call?
2. IMPs, all vul, you hold:
♠AKQ3 ♥Q84 ♦ 76 ♣AKJ8
You are playing weak, 5, 1♣ is 2+. 2♣s is strong and we don't play namyats either.
You deal and the auction goes:
1♣ - 1♥ - 6♣ - Pass
???
Your call.
#2
Posted 2008-May-06, 05:12
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#3
Posted 2008-May-06, 05:16
Although partner does not want me to do anything. I'm quite convinced that he has nine solid clubs. I could bid 7NT but it is IMP´s so I take that small loss for the time partner holds ten not so solid clubs.
2. Pass
So he has a void in hearts but there is no garantee that partner holds diamond ace.
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
#4
Posted 2008-May-06, 05:27
I doubt partner has a 6C opening bid, given
that I hold 3 Aces.
#2 Pass.
I assume you play a forcing raise in the minor.
I am hard pressed to find a possible hand, but
maybe partner holds a 7 card clubs suit and a
heart void.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#5
Posted 2008-May-06, 05:33
If partner has a 12-card suit with the ace, I expect him to find a better way to bid that.
So the only sane reason to open 6♣ I can imagine,
is a weak preempt with an 8+ length in ♣ without the A.
Why else would partner preempt on the 6 level.
Now I expect him to make and I will redouble should opps dbl.
2) 7♣
There are only 3 HCP in the black suits I don't have, and he should be void in ♥ so he has to have ♦A.
#6 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-May-06, 05:41
#7
Posted 2008-May-06, 05:54
#8
Posted 2008-May-06, 06:00
2. Pass. Here we have a much more constructive auction with our side opening. There's not reason to totally jam the auction on a good hand if you're willing to bid 6♣ eventually. Will the opps really bid 6♥ over you after your partner opened and you make a limit+? I think partner has a preemptive hand with long clubs and a heart void. Not willing to bet on the A♦ too for this one.
#9 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-May-06, 06:10
#11
Posted 2008-May-06, 08:04
Pass in the 2nd. Agree with whereagles - too many 'ifs'.
#12
Posted 2008-May-06, 08:33
The second could be a 5 or 7 hand.
#13
Posted 2008-May-06, 09:30
On the second one, pass. All I know is that partner does not have his bid... I wouldn't be at all surprised to make 7, perhaps on the lead of whichever red suit he is void in, but I am not going to make the 'master bid' of 7♣ and find that he already won the board for us by his weird call and I just gave it back.
#14
Posted 2008-May-06, 09:57
#15
Posted 2008-May-06, 10:05
cherdano, on May 6 2008, 10:57 AM, said:
I'd open it 1 club, the Rule of Spades applies.
If I had, say, KQTx in hearts instead, I might be tempted to open 6♣.
I'm trying to figure out how 6♦ would be read over 6♣. I too have an 8 card suit? Or I have a hand that's unsure whether to be in 6NT, 7♣ or 7NT, please help me?
#16
Posted 2008-May-06, 11:06
cherdano, on May 6 2008, 03:57 PM, said:
5♣. Seems to be within the odds.
#17
Posted 2008-May-06, 11:19
jtfanclub, on May 6 2008, 11:05 AM, said:
cherdano, on May 6 2008, 10:57 AM, said:
I'd open it 1 club, the Rule of Spades applies.
I don't know the rule of spades, but I call KQJxxxxxx trumps (even if the smallest spot is the deuce).
#18
Posted 2008-May-06, 12:57
TimG, on May 6 2008, 07:19 PM, said:
jtfanclub, on May 6 2008, 11:05 AM, said:
cherdano, on May 6 2008, 10:57 AM, said:
I'd open it 1 club, the Rule of Spades applies.
I don't know the rule of spades, but I call KQJxxxxxx trumps (even if the smallest spot is the deuce).
Remember that the 1♣ opening is defined as:
Quote
Responder has so many ♣'s that the chance partner hold the 18+ pts is relevant.
With a strong hand as shown why should he jump to 6♣?
Holding ♠xxx ♥- ♦- ♣QJ98765432 you would not care to know how strong opener is and you would find it more likely that opps would be able to make 6♥.
#19
Posted 2008-May-06, 16:57
Since I do not have the AK of trump, I would never raise the 6♣ opening bid on 1.
And since I have no rational way of determining whether partner has both red suits under first round control (and I strongly suspect that he does not) I pass 6C on 2 and hope we don't go down too many.
There is a lot of room between the one level and the six level. Partner certainly had the means at his disposal to make some other call than 6♣ in both cases. I am not playing him for the perfect hand for a grand. If he has the right hand, he probably should not have made the call that he did.
#20
Posted 2008-May-06, 23:50
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."

Help
