Route to slam? Using natural methods
#1
Posted 2008-May-03, 05:46
Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. m
s
t
r-m
nd
ing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees."Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"
"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
#3
Posted 2008-May-03, 09:14
not easy, especially if they compete in clubs up to
3C / 4C, the only pos. thing is, we are both red.
First assume they stay silent:
1D (1) - 1H (1)
3D (2) - 4D (3)
4NT (4) - 5H (4)
5S (5) - 6D (5)
(1) SAYC style
(2) not everyone will like it, it is quite
heavy, if you dont like it try 3C or
try conventional methods
(3) sets trumps, forward going, given you
hold two Aces and know about a 6-3 fit
(4) RKCB, 2 KC
(5) asking for specific kings, no king
The main problem is the heavy 3D rebid,
... but at least I am consistent over time,
my partners have a chance to know this.
One possible conventional solution is to
use 2NT instead of 3D, or invert the meaning
of 2D and 3D.
If they compete, ... maybe using a good / bad
2NT auction will help you, the advantage in this
scenario, you will be able to generate a game
forcing seq.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#4
Posted 2008-May-03, 09:51
whereagles, on May 3 2008, 07:01 AM, said:
The original poster was careless. He should have said realistic route.
#5
Posted 2008-May-03, 09:55
#6
Posted 2008-May-03, 10:43
Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. m
s
t
r-m
nd
ing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees."Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"
"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
#7
Posted 2008-May-03, 10:54
Where 3♦ is checkback (3♣ would be a signoff). Playing methods where 3♣ is checkback and 3♦ is forward-going with support, I can imagine an auction where people took a view:
....2N-3C*-3D-4D-4NT-...
that gets you to 6 diamonds.
#8
Posted 2008-May-03, 11:20
- hrothgar
#9
Posted 2008-May-03, 11:24
han, on May 3 2008, 09:20 AM, said:
yeah, good point, there really is no good way to get to slam after opening 2NT. That was your point, right?
I mean, partner has the same auction with one less ace, so I'm assuming that your point was that you make that bid double dummy but only double dummy, right?
#10
Posted 2008-May-03, 11:57
Eric
#12
Posted 2008-May-03, 13:29
jdonn, on May 3 2008, 03:51 PM, said:
whereagles, on May 3 2008, 07:01 AM, said:
The original poster was careless. He should have said realistic route.
Don't be stupid. 2♣ is a perfectly reasonable way to bid strong 2 hands.
#13 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-May-03, 13:29
whereagles, on May 3 2008, 02:29 PM, said:
jdonn, on May 3 2008, 03:51 PM, said:
whereagles, on May 3 2008, 07:01 AM, said:
The original poster was careless. He should have said realistic route.
Don't be stupid. 2♣ is a perfectly reasonable way to bid strong 2 hands.
I don't think he disagrees! If only this was a strong 2.
#14
Posted 2008-May-03, 13:33
Jlall, on May 3 2008, 07:29 PM, said:
Well, in my book this fits the "Strong 2" definition. Just barely, but it does.
#15
Posted 2008-May-03, 13:41
whereagles, on May 3 2008, 02:29 PM, said:
jdonn, on May 3 2008, 03:51 PM, said:
whereagles, on May 3 2008, 07:01 AM, said:
The original poster was careless. He should have said realistic route.
Don't be stupid.
Agreed! Care to post the hand as an opening bid and find out how stupid everyone but you is? Or should I do it?
#18
Posted 2008-May-03, 20:19
han, on May 3 2008, 12:20 PM, said:
Obviously, you don't know much about bidding.
It should be: 2N-3C-3D-3N-4D-5D-6D
#19
Posted 2008-May-04, 01:10
2NT 4NT
6♦ looks reasonable to me
We might bid
2NT 3♣
3♦ 4NT
6♦
Where 3♣ is our version of puppet Stayman and 4NT would promise both majors and be too strong for 3NT.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#20
Posted 2008-May-04, 01:32
Cascade, on May 4 2008, 07:10 AM, said:
2NT 4NT
6♦ looks reasonable to me
Last time I accepted an invite with an under min and extra cards, it required a good break and some guesswork... (the 1st of which failed). It cost some bucks in prize-money.
Guess I can blame it on pard for making an invite when he knew we'd have at most 32 hcp

Help

Suggest a route to 6D