BBO Discussion Forums: bid or not - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

bid or not bid or not

#1 User is offline   shanbari 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 135
  • Joined: 2004-December-14

Posted 2008-April-25, 12:38

Scoring: IMP



west opened 1H,

W N E S
(1H) x (3H) ?

south bid or not ?

SHAN
0

#2 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2008-April-25, 12:43

Yes, I'd bid. I think it close between double and 3. Double avoids a 4-3 fit; 3 will make things easier if LHO bids 4.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#3 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-April-25, 12:51

3, not close (not close to pass anyway). People passing hands like this is why these preemptive raises are so effective.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#4 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,909
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-April-25, 13:08

3S.

Take away the Queen and I would pass, but only
because of the vulnerability.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#5 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2008-April-25, 13:19

jdonn, on Apr 25 2008, 12:51 PM, said:

3, not close (not close to pass anyway). People passing hands like this is why these preemptive raises are so effective.

Agreed and another reason they are so effective is that many pairs seem to lack the means to catch them with a penalty double when correct and when they can't make their own game.

CLEAR 3 for me.
0

#6 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2008-April-25, 13:25

3 wtp they have a huge heart fit and we have some stuff
0

#7 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-April-25, 14:37

jdonn, on Apr 25 2008, 01:51 PM, said:

3, not close (not close to pass anyway). People passing hands like this is why these preemptive raises are so effective.

Well, it is close to a 4 call. :)
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#8 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2008-April-26, 02:09

Well, because I play double as showing any two suits, I double. But I don't pass.
0

#9 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2008-April-26, 05:55

I agree with Uwe, we are strong enough for 3, but without Q I would rather pass since someone is having overstrenght and will bid again.
0

#10 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2008-April-26, 06:04

Never pass.

I play D as showing exactly four spades. If partner only has three spades, I definately want to get to four of a minor. The idée of showing two suits with a double appeal to me, I have just never thought of it.

In standard methods I'd bid 3.

Best Regards

Ole Berg
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.


Gnasher
0

#11 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,289
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2008-April-26, 10:36

jdonn, on Apr 25 2008, 01:51 PM, said:

3, not close (not close to pass anyway). People passing hands like this is why these preemptive raises are so effective.

The reason these pre-emptive raises are effective is because they take away room, creating a guess, not because weakish hands fail to bid.

We are going to simply love 3 spades when partner tables:

Kxx, xx, KJxx, AKxx
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
0

#12 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2008-April-28, 05:07

Before you bid 3 Spade you need to be sure that:

1. Pd plays you for values as if you have bid 2 Spade, so your slam chances are remote even opposite a power double.

2. Pd must know that competetive bidding is no science, you may end in a bad contract opposite a double like Winstons example.

If your partner is understanding enough for this, this is a wtp 3.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#13 User is offline   shanbari 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 135
  • Joined: 2004-December-14

Posted 2008-April-28, 10:47

here's full hand
6s make, diamond Kxx on side,

Scoring: IMP

SHAN
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users