Page 1 of 1
bid or not bid or not
#2
Posted 2008-April-25, 12:43
Yes, I'd bid. I think it close between double and 3♠. Double avoids a 4-3 fit; 3♠ will make things easier if LHO bids 4♥.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#3
Posted 2008-April-25, 12:51
3♠, not close (not close to pass anyway). People passing hands like this is why these preemptive raises are so effective.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#4
Posted 2008-April-25, 13:08
3S.
Take away the Queen and I would pass, but only
because of the vulnerability.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Take away the Queen and I would pass, but only
because of the vulnerability.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#5
Posted 2008-April-25, 13:19
jdonn, on Apr 25 2008, 12:51 PM, said:
3♠, not close (not close to pass anyway). People passing hands like this is why these preemptive raises are so effective.
Agreed and another reason they are so effective is that many pairs seem to lack the means to catch them with a penalty double when correct and when they can't make their own game.
CLEAR 3♠ for me.
#7
Posted 2008-April-25, 14:37
jdonn, on Apr 25 2008, 01:51 PM, said:
3♠, not close (not close to pass anyway). People passing hands like this is why these preemptive raises are so effective.
Well, it is close to a 4♠ call.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#8
Posted 2008-April-26, 02:09
Well, because I play double as showing any two suits, I double. But I don't pass.
#9
Posted 2008-April-26, 05:55
I agree with Uwe, we are strong enough for 3♠, but without ♣Q I would rather pass since someone is having overstrenght and will bid again.
#10
Posted 2008-April-26, 06:04
Never pass.
I play D as showing exactly four spades. If partner only has three spades, I definately want to get to four of a minor. The idée of showing two suits with a double appeal to me, I have just never thought of it.
In standard methods I'd bid 3♠.
Best Regards
Ole Berg
I play D as showing exactly four spades. If partner only has three spades, I definately want to get to four of a minor. The idée of showing two suits with a double appeal to me, I have just never thought of it.
In standard methods I'd bid 3♠.
Best Regards
Ole Berg
_____________________________________
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#11
Posted 2008-April-26, 10:36
jdonn, on Apr 25 2008, 01:51 PM, said:
3♠, not close (not close to pass anyway). People passing hands like this is why these preemptive raises are so effective.
The reason these pre-emptive raises are effective is because they take away room, creating a guess, not because weakish hands fail to bid.
We are going to simply love 3 spades when partner tables:
Kxx, xx, KJxx, AKxx
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
#12
Posted 2008-April-28, 05:07
Before you bid 3 Spade you need to be sure that:
1. Pd plays you for values as if you have bid 2 Spade, so your slam chances are remote even opposite a power double.
2. Pd must know that competetive bidding is no science, you may end in a bad contract opposite a double like Winstons example.
If your partner is understanding enough for this, this is a wtp 3♠.
1. Pd plays you for values as if you have bid 2 Spade, so your slam chances are remote even opposite a power double.
2. Pd must know that competetive bidding is no science, you may end in a bad contract opposite a double like Winstons example.
If your partner is understanding enough for this, this is a wtp 3♠.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Page 1 of 1

Help

west opened 1H,
W N E S
(1H) x (3H) ?
south bid or not ?