Downgrade?
#1
Posted 2008-March-13, 04:03
#2
Posted 2008-March-13, 04:06
Opening 1NT is g00t
#4
Posted 2008-March-13, 04:52
#5
Posted 2008-March-13, 05:07
This is about as good as a below-average balanced 14-count. Clear downgrade, would open this a 14-16NT.
I think I would consider opening this a 15-17 1N only if white at MPs.
#6
Posted 2008-March-13, 06:45
#7
Posted 2008-March-13, 06:52
I don't think it is ever right to downgrade a balanced hand when deciding whether to open 1NT.
#8
Posted 2008-March-13, 07:18
rogerclee, on Mar 13 2008, 12:07 PM, said:
This is about as good as a below-average balanced 14-count. Clear downgrade, would open this a 14-16NT.
I think I would consider opening this a 15-17 1N only if white at MPs.
Well, I didn't open Kxx AKxx Kx A10xx 1NT on Monday it was too good.
Anyway, if this is from last night, and gnasher was playing with one of my regular partners, then I know that the partner doesn't like downgrades - he has disagreed with 2 of the last 3 15s that I downgraded. And he announces our opening as "15-17 could be a good 14".
#9
Posted 2008-March-13, 07:38
FrancesHinden, on Mar 13 2008, 02:18 PM, said:
I think that clearly worth upgrading.
Quote
It is, and I was, but he was the only one to express any support for my decision to downgrade this. I expect he thinks I need an extra point or two to make up for the way I play the cards.
#10
Posted 2008-March-13, 07:40
#11
Posted 2008-March-13, 08:56
1D with AQxx is ok for competitive lead directing purpose.
1D---1H----??? i have np for 2H
1D---1S----??? i have np for 2S.
1D---1Nt---??? i have np with pass
1D---limit-----i have np with 3Nt
so ill open this 1 1D because i feel that 1D & continuation describe the hand better then a 1Nt bid.
In a 12-14 nt i would never open this one 1nt.
In a strong club (15+) i would open 1C. So its not because i find the hand too weak that im opening 1D.
Finding the exact numerical strenght of the hand isnt what is important , finding the best way to show the value of the hand is what is important.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#13
Posted 2008-March-13, 10:01
#14
Posted 2008-March-13, 11:06
#15
Posted 2008-March-13, 11:50
#16
Posted 2008-March-13, 13:16
Jlall, on Mar 13 2008, 10:58 AM, said:
I decided not to post in this thread and still...
- hrothgar
#17
Posted 2008-March-13, 13:37
Yes it is a bad 15 perhaps a very bad 15. Two aces are the good features and everything else is bad.
If you are very sound on your minimum balanced hands, say never opening 11s and passing some 12s then you are much better place to downgrade than if you frequently open 11s. This is because your 1NT rebids are fairly narrow in the first case but much wider (and even wider still if you start downgrading) in the later case.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#18
Posted 2008-March-13, 13:51
#19
Posted 2008-March-13, 23:39
I'm bidding my 15-17 NT.
#20
Posted 2008-March-14, 01:56
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...

Help
