BBO Discussion Forums: VANDERBILT Round of 16 - First Quarter - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

VANDERBILT Round of 16 - First Quarter scores

#1 User is offline   JanM 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 737
  • Joined: 2006-January-31

Posted 2008-March-12, 13:52

After I posted this I saw that ACBL is now posting scores. Go to http://www.acbl.org/.../vanderbilt.htm for quarter by quarter scores. See you in the Vugraph room starting tonight :rolleyes:

1. Weed - 14
16. Mahaffey - 30

2. Allegaert - 20
15. Gordon - 32

3. O'Rourke - 35
14. Onstott - 29

4. Katz - 32
13. Rosenthal - 32

5. Strul - 26
12. Rubin - 66

6. Gromov - 2
11. Martens - 41

7. Meltzer - 40
10. Jones - 7

8. Goldberg - 36
9. Shenkin - 37
Jan Martel, who should probably state that she is not speaking on behalf of the USBF, the ACBL, the WBF Systems Committee, or any member of any Systems Committee or Laws Commission.
0

#2 User is offline   y66 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,497
  • Joined: 2006-February-24

Posted 2008-March-12, 16:19

Will be there. Thanks Jan! :)
If you lose all hope, you can always find it again -- Richard Ford in The Sportswriter
0

#3 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-March-12, 16:24

JanM, on Mar 12 2008, 02:52 PM, said:

1. Weed - 14
16. Mahaffey - 30

The ACBL site gave 24-30, not sure which is right.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#4 User is offline   JanM 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 737
  • Joined: 2006-January-31

Posted 2008-March-12, 16:34

I don't know :-), but that's the match that will be on Vugraph this evening - it's now a 4 IMP difference (I didn't write the scores down because ACBL did so well with the first quarter, but I think it's 66-62 with Cayne leading. The only match with more than an 11 IMP difference at the half is Meltzer (30 something in favor of Meltzer).
Jan Martel, who should probably state that she is not speaking on behalf of the USBF, the ACBL, the WBF Systems Committee, or any member of any Systems Committee or Laws Commission.
0

#5 User is offline   JanM 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 737
  • Joined: 2006-January-31

Posted 2008-March-12, 17:08

Since the half time scores haven't appeared on the ACBL page, here they are (and ACBL was right about the first quarter Weed score - sorry!):

1. Weed - 62
16. Mahaffey - 66

2. Allegaert - 55
15. Gordon - 60
Heading in the right direction :). Justin was out the first quarter, in the second.

3. O'Rourke - 69
14. Onstott - 58

4. Katz - 67
13. Rosenthal - 60

5. Strul - 70
12. Rubin - 80
Also heading in the right direction :)

6. Gromov - 38
11. Martens - 51

7. Meltzer - 76
10. Jones - 40

8. Goldberg - 57
9. Shenkin - 64
Jan Martel, who should probably state that she is not speaking on behalf of the USBF, the ACBL, the WBF Systems Committee, or any member of any Systems Committee or Laws Commission.
0

#6 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-March-12, 17:14

pwnage time
0

#7 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-March-12, 17:40

We get Weed vs Mahaffey (Mahaffey up 4, fine). JEC - and all that. Good enuf.

We also get Gromov vs Martens (Martens up 13).

I'd rather watch those Allegaert characters take on Gordon (Passell, Wold). Its a close match too.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#8 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-March-12, 17:44

Wow almost all are close!
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#9 User is offline   h2osmom 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 77
  • Joined: 2006-May-01

Posted 2008-March-12, 17:44

I would also prefer to watch the team that upset the number 2 seed, wonder if they took a vote of BBO members, who people would most prefer to watch?
0

#10 User is offline   glen 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,637
  • Joined: 2003-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa, Canada
  • Interests:Military history, WW II wargames

Posted 2008-March-12, 18:32

h2osmom, on Mar 12 2008, 06:44 PM, said:

I would also prefer to watch the team that upset the number 2 seed, wonder if they took a vote of BBO members, who people would most prefer to watch?

I like the current matches tonight, as they may be some teams we will not see later. For Justin's team we will able to watch him in the semis and the finals.
'I hit my peak at seven' Taylor Swift
0

#11 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-March-12, 18:33

officeglen, on Mar 12 2008, 06:32 PM, said:

h2osmom, on Mar 12 2008, 06:44 PM, said:

I would also prefer to watch the team that upset the number 2 seed,  wonder if they took a vote of BBO members,  who people would most prefer to watch?

I like the current matches tonight, as they may be some teams we will not see later. For Justin's team we will able to watch him in the semis and the finals.

Good point!
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#12 User is offline   JanM 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 737
  • Joined: 2006-January-31

Posted 2008-March-13, 00:11

Well, it turned out we were limited in which matches we could show by the fact that we could only have phone lines in two of the rooms. Sorry we couldn't go with our original "show the closest match" plan. But at least you got to see Justin in action for the 4th quarter.

Tomorrow we hope that all the logistics will be worked out so we can show both tables from each match for a half, unless we start badly and one of the matches we didn't have on in the afternoon is very one-sided, but at this point in the event there are unlikely to be any one-sided matches.
Jan Martel, who should probably state that she is not speaking on behalf of the USBF, the ACBL, the WBF Systems Committee, or any member of any Systems Committee or Laws Commission.
0

#13 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-March-13, 01:59

lol all I could think during the last set was "these guys must think im insane" haha

btw last time I was in the final 8 I lost a close match to Joe so no chance of us losing this one :)

another btw for those who watched the broadcast: I did unblock the HQ when pratap was in 3N thats why he claimed 3 (he played a heart to make sure I didn't have QJT), and I don't think it was my fault on the hand they got to 5S and I played ace of hearts heart, my partner played the 6 from K96 udca. And there are def hands where a heart back is required to beat, ie AKQJxxx xx AK Ax (heart heart spade beats them), or AKQJxxxx xx AK x. My partner agreed he played the wrong heart spot and was tired.

This post has been edited by Jlall: 2008-March-13, 02:26

0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users