BBO Discussion Forums: Continue? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Continue?

#1 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-January-19, 12:34

Scoring: IMP


Opps silent:

1♦ - 1♠ - 2♣ - 2♦ - ?
"Phil" on BBO
0

#2 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2008-January-19, 13:16

2♥, but pass is not unreasonable.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#3 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2008-January-19, 14:15

2♥. Pass is unreasonable. :blink:

Opposite as little as:

Axxx T9x xxxx Ax

you are cold for 5♦.

Opposite as little as:

AQxx Txx xxx QJx

or

KQTx xxx xxx QJx

you have a lot of play for 3NT.
0

#4 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-January-19, 14:44

Pass.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#5 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-January-19, 16:07

2♥ for me. I have no problem with pass.
0

#6 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-January-19, 16:11

Pass for me. I have no problem with 2♥ :P
0

#7 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2008-January-19, 16:21

pass. can i go back and bid 1nt instead of 2c?
0

#8 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-January-19, 16:35

Pass. Opposite as little as KQ of spades and a doubleton diamond we are already too high.

ArtK78, on Jan 19 2008, 03:15 PM, said:

Opposite as little as:

Axxx T9x xxxx Ax

you are cold for 5♦.

I wish my partners always had so little. I hope next time my partner has four card support, two aces, the perfect doubleton, and even his T9 working that the opponents find the ruff they are over 50% to have available.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#9 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2008-January-19, 16:50

Assuming 2D was inv+ S-raise I go 2S =inv C-raise. One cue begets another.
0

#10 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-January-19, 17:36

pass, lol@ the examples of "as little as"
0

#11 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2008-January-19, 19:04

2♣ was natural right? we didn't reverse because we weren't strong enough.... So then we aren't strong enough to bid 2♥.
0

#12 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,297
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-January-19, 20:45

pclayton, on Jan 19 2008, 01:34 PM, said:

<!-- ONEHAND begin --><table border='1'> <tr> <td> <table> <tr> <td> Dealer: </td> <td> South </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Vul: </td> <td> None </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Scoring: </td> <td> IMP </td> </tr> </table> </td> <td> <table> <tr> <th> <span class='spades'> ♠ </span> </th> <td> x </td> </tr> <tr> <th> <span class='hearts'> ♥ </span> </th> <td> QJxx </td> </tr> <tr> <th> <span class='diamonds'> ♦ </span> </th> <td> AKQxx </td> </tr> <tr> <th> <span class='clubs'> ♣ </span> </th> <td> KTx </td> </tr> </table> </td> <td>  </td> </tr> </table><!-- ONEHAND end -->

Opps silent:

1♦ - 1♠ - 2♣ - 2♦ - ?

Ugg...really tough hand for me. Partner could have 10-11 flat hcp for 2d or nothing.

I guess a max 2d with no spots could be:

Axxx...Kxx...xxx....Axx or if this is too much a tiny bit less, perhaps....


I will pass but 2h is tempting.
0

#13 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2008-January-19, 21:45

ArtK78, on Jan 20 2008, 03:15 AM, said:

2♥.  Pass is unreasonable.  :)

Opposite as little as:

Axxx T9x xxxx Ax

you are cold for 5♦.

Opposite as little as:

AQxx Txx xxx QJx

or

KQTx xxx xxx QJx

you have a lot of play for 3NT.

Hmm. It looks like there might be a H ruff in the offing here. It's hardly "cold."

Anyway I pass. Absolutely loath the 2C bid on a non existent suit. It really deserves a 5C bid. Whats wrong with 1NT?
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#14 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,297
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-January-19, 22:46

"Whats wrong with 1NT?"

If 1nt is limited to 11-13..you(me) got a problem.......maybe even a problem if 11-14?

tough hand.
0

#15 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-January-20, 00:06

Yup, spot on Mike.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#16 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2008-January-20, 03:02

mike777, on Jan 20 2008, 11:46 AM, said:

"Whats wrong with 1NT?"

If 1nt is limited to 11-13..you(me) got a problem.......maybe even a problem if 11-14?

tough hand.

The problem with bidding a non existent suit here is that you may well lose the H suit. Look at this responding hand for example:
Qxxxx Axxx xx xx
After 1D 1S 2C responder will give prefence to 2D and your H fit is futsch!

Or with Qxxx Axx xx xxxx
partner will pass 2C and you play in the wonderful 4-3 C fit rather than your 5-2 D fit.

Further if you saying that opener should always bid 2H on this hand after preference to 2D, look at the number of posters who are passing.

Nope, I still think 2C sucks. If you don't like bidding 1NT, bid 2D.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#17 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-January-20, 11:19

I held this hand.

I'm very surprised Ron is coming down so hard on 2♣. 1N is wrong on two counts and 2♦ is also flawed.

I passed 2♦. 9 or 11 tricks seemed a long way off, although this particular partner isn't the modern type that would respond with a 4 count. She actually held:

♠Axxx ♥K ♦T9xx ♣Qxxx

(Do you agree with 2♦?)

11 tricks was a breeze with this catch. Gratifying to know most of my peers pass 2♦ however.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#18 User is offline   Rebound 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 518
  • Joined: 2004-July-25

Posted 2008-January-20, 12:06

I may be crazy but I think it's worth 3♦. Partner (typically) has at least 9 cards in the minors so you have a double fit, plus the spades are headed by the A and you have shortness in the unbid suit. Or perhaps if a mini-splinter in ♥ is available.
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy - but it might improve my bridge.
0

#19 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2008-January-21, 03:23

I am with Ron and dislike the 2 Club bid. I had bid 1 NT or 2 Diamond depending on my agreements.

Pds hand was fine for 2 Diamond, because the singelton K sucks. It is not much better then Axxx,x,xxxx,qxxx.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#20 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2008-January-21, 14:20

The only sensible way to reach game wod be to bid 2 diamonds instead of 2 cubs and get a raise, but that raise is far from clear.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users