BBO Discussion Forums: rate these noobs. - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

rate these noobs.

Poll: 1 is biggest 5 is "noob who is almost a novice" (7 member(s) have cast votes)

1 is biggest 5 is "noob who is almost a novice"

  1. 1 (3 votes [42.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 42.86%

  2. 2 (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. 3 (1 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  4. 4 (2 votes [28.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.57%

  5. 5 (1 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-January-11, 14:28

You play 5 and have 2 losers outside of diamonds.

Your diamonds are AKxxx in hand, xxx in dummy. No squeeze. Nothing. RHO leads a small diamond. So you ruff, play a couple of other tricks and claim, showing 4 diamonds. They accept. Since it's the last board of the round, you quickly leave the table.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   mr1303 

  • Admirer of Walter the Walrus
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,569
  • Joined: 2003-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.

Posted 2008-January-11, 15:03

I don't think this is the place to glamorise cheating.
0

#3 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-January-11, 15:09

The noob is the person pulling this stunt, not the duped opponents.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#4 User is offline   SoTired 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,016
  • Joined: 2005-June-20
  • Location:Lovettsville, VA

Posted 2008-January-11, 15:12

And you did not go back and correct the score when you realized you revoked?

Were there lives on the line? Does winning mean so much to you that you are willing to sell your ethics to steal a good board from otherwise honorable people?

Are you bragging how they foolishly trusted you?

I will rate you a zero on a 1 to 10 scale of integrity. You cheated trusting people to win nothing. Worse, you chuckle about how you cheated them. Worse still, you expect us to share in your chuckle.
It costs nothing to be nice -- my better half
0

#5 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2008-January-11, 15:26

I hope this is apocryphal. Otherwise my opinion of you has gone way down.

I'm sure you don't care, though.
0

#6 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-January-11, 15:31

Csaba?
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#7 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2008-January-11, 15:33

I am sure this post is meant as a joke.

Everyone is taking this far too seriously.
0

#8 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2008-January-11, 17:54

impressive strategy
0

#9 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-January-11, 18:00

My reliable source tells me Csaba was the victim not the culprit...
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#10 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2008-January-11, 18:04

cherdano, on Jan 11 2008, 07:00 PM, said:

My reliable source tells me Csaba was the victim not the culprit...

That does not surprise me.
0

#11 User is offline   MickyB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 2004-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2008-January-11, 18:06

matmat, on Jan 12 2008, 12:04 AM, said:

cherdano, on Jan 11 2008, 07:00 PM, said:

My reliable source tells me Csaba was the victim not the culprit...

That does not surprise me.

Indeed...he's obviously the noobiest.

But yeah, that was my best guess from the original post. I voted for 4 - there are times when I just "switch off" and play the cards in front of me, I certainly wouldn't notice a deliberate revoke 100% of the time when playing like that.
0

#12 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,397
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2008-January-13, 15:18

Hey will you please be nice to Csaba? Maybe you don't understand and/or appreciate this joke (or whatever it was) but that is no excuse for all those flames.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#13 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-January-13, 15:28

Ugh sorry everyone. I really was the victim. I suppose the formulation was a little ambiguous. The opps left very very quickly. It was very impressive. I actually think it's a little humorous. As long as I'm a noob and they can get away with it, I can hardly do anything but laugh about it. Perhaps I should not have posted it. I apologize to anyone who was shocked or insulted.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#14 User is offline   mr1303 

  • Admirer of Walter the Walrus
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,569
  • Joined: 2003-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.

Posted 2008-January-13, 15:56

In which case I withdraw my comment.

Incidently, it is much funnier if you confess your scam at the time. This is one that happened to me:

http://www.poorbridge.com/?cotm=1
0

#15 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2008-January-14, 12:14

gwnn, on Jan 13 2008, 04:28 PM, said:

I apologize to anyone who was shocked or insulted.

I assure you that I was schocked and insulted by the person who perpetrated this scheme, not by the victim of it!
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users