The hand seems worth a reverse after a 1N reply (due to the club fit), but maybe not after a 1♠ reply.
Assess the Auction and Debate
#21
Posted 2008-January-07, 11:58
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#22
Posted 2008-January-07, 17:13
helene_t, on Jan 7 2008, 09:57 AM, said:
That question is a lot tougher. I'll say 60% chance you were opener and 40% that you were responder.
Good guess. I was opener.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#23
Posted 2008-January-07, 17:17
inquiry, on Jan 7 2008, 10:44 AM, said:
The only problem with this logic, is then why did you post this hand? This is one of the simpliest hands in the world to bid, and doesn't take a great bidder on either side to reach 3NT from the correct side.
Well, I was supposedly "playing up," but I caught hell for this auction.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#24
Posted 2008-January-07, 17:18
cherdano, on Jan 7 2008, 07:58 PM, said:
The hand seems worth a reverse after a 1N reply (due to the club fit), but maybe not after a 1♠ reply.
Agree with that.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#25
Posted 2008-January-07, 17:18
pclayton, on Jan 7 2008, 11:32 AM, said:
I don't care for a reverse on this hand.
I already panned the 1♠ call in the other thread, but I think this is a reasonable auction:
1♦ - 1N
2♣ - 3♣
3♥ - 3N.
This auction is a galaxy away from the original sequence. Here, 3♥ is definitely 'where you live' and is the most effective route to 3N or 5♣.
Responder can volley back with 3♠ with a holding such as Axx or Kxx and we'll still right-side the NT if Opener has Qx or such.
I don't know who you were here. My guess is you were playing with your clone
I already panned the 1♠ call in the other thread, but I think this is a reasonable auction:
1♦ - 1N
2♣ - 3♣
3♥ - 3N.
This auction is a galaxy away from the original sequence. Here, 3♥ is definitely 'where you live' and is the most effective route to 3N or 5♣.
Responder can volley back with 3♠ with a holding such as Axx or Kxx and we'll still right-side the NT if Opener has Qx or such.
I don't know who you were here. My guess is you were playing with your clone
This auction is miles different. I also agree that 3♥ in this auction is "where you live." Fourth suits are usually different, IMO.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.

Help
