Do you agree with the initial pass? What now?
Did I do this to myself? Matchpoints
#2
Posted 2007-December-17, 17:04
kfay, on Dec 17 2007, 05:58 PM, said:
(1♠)-P-(1NT)-P
(Pass)-?
Do you agree with the initial pass? What now?
1) No I double.
2) Now I just pass.
#3
Posted 2007-December-17, 17:05
For what it is worth, I have played a technique where a 1NT direct overcall with this sort of hand is used. You need a lot of checkback sequences, though. As a simple example, a Responder who would normall bid 2NT or 3NT would instead "transfer" to spades to check on stoppers. Similarly, Smolen or a 2♠ bid after Stayman also check on stoppers.
Without that, you pass twice, I think.
-P.J. Painter.
#4
Posted 2007-December-17, 17:13
kfay, on Dec 18 2007, 01:58 AM, said:
(1♠)-P-(1NT)-P
(Pass)-?
Do you agree with the initial pass? What now?
1. Yes
2. I pass again
#5
Posted 2007-December-17, 17:20
Now just pass m8.
George Carlin
#6
Posted 2007-December-17, 17:44
Now what's the hope for plus given partner passed? His S under whatever opener has, but rest says try for partial. reopen X.
#7
Posted 2007-December-17, 18:04
#8
Posted 2007-December-17, 19:57
- hrothgar
#9
Posted 2007-December-17, 21:30
inquiry, on Dec 17 2007, 06:04 PM, said:
100% agreement here, Ben. 15 HCP and good support in the 3 card suits is just enough for me, inspite of 4333. I find doubling now means that I have fewer uncomfortable decisions later in comp.
On the 2nd go, I have to pass as well. three small ♠ when the opps don't have a fit isn't pretty and we are all vul at MP.
If the opps make 1NT thats 90 for them, but if I double and we go off 1 in some 4-3 fit, thats 100 for them.
If we are beating 1NT by a trick we get 100, but if we make 2m on the nose we get 90.
Perhaps we are beating 1NT but after our double, the opps end up making 2 of something ? Perhaps we end up doubled and off 1 or 2 at the 2 level for a near 0. I think the risk of this is too much and won't be offset by the miracle 4♥ we may find (likely taking some gambling in the bidding to get that high). I think the risk won't be offset by the times we push the opps higher elsewhere and often if we make our 2 bid, we can take 1NT down 1.
Just my opinion .. neilkaz ..
#10
Posted 2007-December-17, 21:37
#11
Posted 2007-December-17, 22:08
#12
Posted 2007-December-17, 22:51
cherdano, on Dec 17 2007, 10:37 PM, said:
Me too. Obviously a balanced 12 or 13 may be a different story but this is 15 and we have a reasonable way into the auction, probably our last reasonable way.
#13
Posted 2007-December-18, 03:41
#14
Posted 2007-December-18, 03:42
yes the first pass is ok, although a t/o double
would be ok as well.
Having passed the first round, you pass again.
With kind regads
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#16
Posted 2007-December-18, 15:42
Edmunte1, on Dec 18 2007, 01:15 PM, said:
-initial double
-pass and pass
me too.
I don't feel strongly about the first round. I've seen doubles on this sort of hand work very well, and I've seen them work very badly. I haven't seen enough to decide if it's winning bridge or not.
1NT on the first round is horrible.

Help

(1♠)-P-(1NT)-P
(Pass)-?