BBO Discussion Forums: Does this even have a name? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Does this even have a name? Or is it just rank stupidity?

#21 User is offline   dburn 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,154
  • Joined: 2005-July-19

Posted 2007-December-17, 18:13

whereagles, on Dec 16 2007, 05:29 PM, said:

indeed. this is a nice, non-trivial problem. helene's line puts some pressure on the defenders (if they don't force dummy, it should be plain sailing), so maybe that's something to try out in practice.

It might be plain sailing, but then again it might not. Presumably if the jack of diamonds holds, you will draw trumps and repeat the diamond finesse - but if East is a strong player, the second diamond finesse might lose, whereupon you will go down at least one.

Leading a middle diamond at trick two and simply playing for 3-2 breaks in both red suits seems the most promising approach. If I have understood aright, the line chosen at the table - heart to the ace, club ruff, middle diamond - makes the contract on almost no distribution of the outstanding cards assuming half-way competent defence, so can safely be dismissed.

An alternative line - heart to the ace, club ruff, and three rounds of diamonds - appears to require a later successful guess in spades even if the queen of diamonds falls on the first two rounds of the suit. It is therefore indeed a "close second", but only to the original line in terms of futility, not to any sensible line in terms of probability of success.
When Senators have had their sport
And sealed the Law by vote,
It little matters what they thought -
We hang for what they wrote.
0

#22 User is offline   Blofeld 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 775
  • Joined: 2005-May-05
  • Location:Oxford
  • Interests:mathematics, science fiction, Tolkien, go, fencing, word games, board games, bad puns, juggling, Mornington Crescent, philosophy, Tom Lehrer, rock climbing, jootsing, drinking tea, plotting to take over the world, croquet . . . and most other things, really.

Posted 2007-December-17, 18:43

whereagles, on Dec 17 2007, 05:35 PM, said:

Goldbach's conjecture > Riemann's hypothesis :)

Someone put a purported proof of the Goldbach Conjecture up today ...

But anyway, I don't think it's more famous than than the Riemann Hypothesis (and it doesn't even compare in terms of importance).
0

#23 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-December-17, 18:47

"if I can show this to be true then the conjecture will have been proven" wtf?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#24 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-December-18, 03:28

Blofeld, on Dec 18 2007, 12:43 AM, said:

Someone put a purported proof of the Goldbach Conjecture up today ...

huh... Fermat's last theorem also had like a dozen alledged "proofs" coming in each week. Rumor goes that the french mathematics society person in charge of checking the proofs had a stamp saying something like

"Dear Sir/Madam,

Your proof of Fermat's Last Theorem has an error on page _____, line _____."

and leave it to his assistant to fill in the blanks :unsure:
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users