BBO Discussion Forums: Fun at IMP Pairs - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Fun at IMP Pairs

#1 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2007-November-18, 22:58

Board 12 of an ACBL IMP pair event on BBO. We are having a good game. I picked up in first seat at favorable vulnerability:

Scoring: XIMP


We play that a 3♣ opening is preemptive but guarantees AQ or AK or better. That is what I have, so I opened 3♣. LHO passed, and pard responded 3♥ - natural and forcing. I didn't have a suitable hand to raise, so I bid 3NT - it is sort of obligatory - I have to raise or bid 3NT opposite a forcing hand. It went all pass.

The opening lead was the ♥7, and here is what I saw:


Scoring: XIMP

3♣-(P)-3♥-(P)
3NT-All Pass


I guessed to play the ♥Q from dummy which held. Down 2 (I could not figure out a way to make the hand).

The full hand was:

Scoring: XIMP

0

#2 User is offline   MomoTheDog 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 33
  • Joined: 2007-November-18

Posted 2007-November-19, 00:06

Very nice! Should have been -9 down!
0

#3 User is offline   dicklont 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 750
  • Joined: 2007-October-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands
  • Interests:Bridge, music, sports

Posted 2007-November-19, 00:56

Very clever. As your opponent I would really be sick now.
Some people would argue that it is illegal or 3♥ should be alerted as possibly psychic,
but that would ruïn the fun, wouldn't it?
--
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
0

#4 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-November-19, 01:26

Some people play that

(some preempt)-p-(new suit=forcing and "strong")-X is takeout of the original preempt.

See also:

http://forums.bridge...howtopic=16938

This particular NS pair could have reached their 4♥ contract or at least 5♣x with relative ease had they had this agreement.

But that doesnt take away anything from the merits of your psyche :)
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#5 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-November-19, 16:45

(3♣) 3♥

bridge is so easy when you bid your suits :P
0

#6 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2007-November-20, 01:44

whereagles, on Nov 20 2007, 07:45 AM, said:

(3♣) 3♥

bridge is so easy when you bid your suits :P

yes but unluckily the south and East had had been switched, so your are in 3 ♥ X -4. In red.
Bridge is so easy if opps bid with insufficent values. :P

For me this hand is a little too weak for a direct call, but it is close.

I prefer Czabas method.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#7 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-November-20, 03:35

Codo, on Nov 20 2007, 09:44 AM, said:

whereagles, on Nov 20 2007, 07:45 AM, said:

(3♣) 3♥

bridge is so easy when you bid your suits ;)

yes but unluckily the south and East had had been switched, so your are in 3 ♥ X -4. In red.
Bridge is so easy if opps bid with insufficent values. ;)

For me this hand is a little too weak for a direct call, but it is close.

I prefer Czabas method.

to be fair, it's rather hard to keep 3♥ to 5 tricks :)
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#8 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2007-November-20, 03:49

I thought you are the declarer ;)
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users