I really think you should use the gadgets. If you don't use them on the rare occasions they come up, you're better off not wasting memory on them.
What to show?
#22
Posted 2007-November-16, 11:39
For what it's worth, the opposite hand is:
♠AQJTxx
♥x
♦xx
♣KTxx
You will find small slam easily starting with a cuebid.
But the lesson here I felt was not to start with EKCB. You will have no idea what to do over a 5♥ bid (or whatever you play that shows 1 keycard) from partner, although it's certainly the easiest way to find grand if he has 2.
♠AQJTxx
♥x
♦xx
♣KTxx
You will find small slam easily starting with a cuebid.
But the lesson here I felt was not to start with EKCB. You will have no idea what to do over a 5♥ bid (or whatever you play that shows 1 keycard) from partner, although it's certainly the easiest way to find grand if he has 2.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
#23 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-November-16, 11:41
Echognome, on Nov 16 2007, 12:39 PM, said:
For what it's worth, the opposite hand is:
♠AQJTxx
♥x
♦xx
♣KTxx
You will find small slam easily starting with a cuebid.
But the lesson here I felt was not to start with EKCB. You will have no idea what to do over a 5♥ bid (or whatever you play that shows 1 keycard) from partner, although it's certainly the easiest way to find grand if he has 2.
♠AQJTxx
♥x
♦xx
♣KTxx
You will find small slam easily starting with a cuebid.
But the lesson here I felt was not to start with EKCB. You will have no idea what to do over a 5♥ bid (or whatever you play that shows 1 keycard) from partner, although it's certainly the easiest way to find grand if he has 2.
Bet I'd get to 7S making after bidding exclusion in hearts
#24
Posted 2007-November-16, 16:53
Jlall, on Nov 15 2007, 11:12 PM, said:
skaeran, on Nov 15 2007, 05:00 PM, said:
The fake void splinter/EKCB is a well-known strategy, btw.
yes I know. That does not mean opponents play for it to be happening. If I were to play against the same opponents for tens of thousands of boards I agree with mixed strategy, however I don't expect this situation to happen vs the same opponents more than once in my life ever, so a mixed strategy does not make sense. It's just a question of what level they are thinking on, and what level they think you are thinking on at the time.
Yeah, agree with this. I was thinking more in general here. The bridge community in Norway is small enough that if I pulled this stunt a couple of times "everyone" would know about it - thus the mixed strategy.
Kind regards,
Harald
Harald

Help
