Tactics
#1 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-October-28, 00:05
1C on your left, 2N by pard (reds 5-5+), 4S on your right. White/white rubber. What is your bid? (yes this did happen).
If you bid 5H and they bid 5S, what is your plan? What about if they bid 6S?
If you bid 6H and they bid 6S, what is your plan?
#2
Posted 2007-October-28, 03:44
#3
Posted 2007-October-28, 06:31
-P.J. Painter.
#4
Posted 2007-October-28, 09:25
I'll go with 6♥, pass 6♠, lead a diamond. It seems possible that partner has the ♦A or can otherwise set the slam via diamond tricks.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#5
Posted 2007-October-28, 09:34
#6
Posted 2007-October-28, 09:49
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
#7
Posted 2007-October-28, 10:36
I mean, so far they haven't even made 4S, and if partner holds the two aces for his bid they might not make it.
I have no other plan but to pass and try to beat what they bid.
#8
Posted 2007-October-28, 10:40
Just pass.
6♥ at any other form of scoring.
#9
Posted 2007-October-28, 11:30
Winston, you hold 7 hearts (7!) so partner's heart ace won't hold.
- hrothgar
#10
Posted 2007-October-28, 13:29
However, we know that LHO has a stiff or void heart: if he has a void, then it is highly unlikely that he will pass even with a minimum.
Bidding 5♦ is also tempting, not because of lead issues (we will probably be on lead) but because it may cause the opps to misplace cards on the auction: LHO with Kxx in diamonds may get carried away feeling that partner is marked with a stiff, and so on. But that requires quite a parlay, and may get partner not cashing his second diamond trick after we make that lead... after all, why should he play us, rather than declarer, for short diamonds?
either 5 or 6♥ rates to be best, but I don't know how we choose between them.
I am going to bid 5♥, because I will pass 5♠. If they bid 6♠ (presumably after LHO bids 5♠ or 6♥ or makes a forcing pass), I will let them play there.
What persuades me it that we have a chance for a plus against 6♠, and I think there is too much risk of -500 by bidding 6♥.
I am not a rubber bridge player, and I don't know the percentages well enough to be comfortable, but if they make slam after a ♦ lead, then I suspect we are 800 in 6♥ and that can't be a good result, even compared to allowing them to make the first game and a 500 slam bonus.
#11
Posted 2007-October-28, 15:48
1) It's a 5 to 1 chance (83%) that partner holds ♥A, so, except a club uppercut , we'll lose maximum 4 tricks in our ♥ contract
2) Opener has surely 5+♣ (holding maximum 1♥ and opening 1♣), so clubs is a secondary suit for opps.
3)Frequenty if 6♠ makes, 7♠ will make too, due to the club suit (we'll ruff ♦ or if partner has a stopper in ♣, when he'll get the hand in clubs, possibly will cash the ♦ trick)
4) I prefer on this kind of boards to use ''put opps to take the last guess'' tactic. So my bid will be 6♥. Why? I can live with small loses (going 2 down in 6 ♥ instead of 1 in 5♥ or writing +50 in 5♠), but winning when, due to lack of space:
-opps play 6♠ instead of 7
-opps doubling us for 1-3-500 instead of their cold slam
-opps bidding 6♠ and going down (i'll pass 6♠ obiously)
-opps bidding 7♠ and going down
#13
Posted 2007-October-28, 19:15
Against unknowns I pass and wait to see what happens, (if anything.)
#14
Posted 2007-October-29, 02:25
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#16 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-October-29, 20:16
edited a typo
This post has been edited by Jlall: 2007-October-29, 22:12
#17
Posted 2007-October-29, 22:06
You are conceding 300 - 500 above the line at best, and they might might an inspired guess and bid a 6 we can't beat. Most of the time, they'll take their 120 below, and hope for the rubber on the next deal.
I can respect 5♥. It looks like 300 max and could be a cheap 100 against their game on.
#18 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-October-29, 22:08
#19
Posted 2007-October-29, 22:11
Jlall, on Oct 29 2007, 09:16 PM, said:
Si la jeunesse savait, si la vieillesse pouvait... et si la loi permettait.
And sealed the Law by vote,
It little matters what they thought -
We hang for what they wrote.
#20 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-October-29, 22:13
dburn, on Oct 29 2007, 11:11 PM, said:
Jlall, on Oct 29 2007, 09:16 PM, said:
Si la jeunesse savait, si la vieillesse pouvait... et si la loi permettait.
If only old has beens were not so oblivious to very obvious typos (don't know how to say that in french).

Help
