BBO Discussion Forums: another who's to blame - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

another who's to blame

Poll: who's to blame? (34 member(s) have cast votes)

who's to blame?

  1. N (2 votes [5.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.88%

  2. S (18 votes [52.94%])

    Percentage of vote: 52.94%

  3. methods (11 votes [32.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 32.35%

  4. S declarer play (1 votes [2.94%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.94%

  5. bad luck (2 votes [5.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.88%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-October-25, 06:35

Scoring: IMP


(1)-1-p-2(forcing)
p-2-all pass

-500 (W forgot to double)

other table E opened weak nt W transfered and passed for +140.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2007-October-25, 06:55

You did not offer both as an option. Both are at fault, but the blame goes primarily to South for that overcall.

South's overcall is awful (I know from reading these threads that many will disagree with me, but that's life). North bid hearts - that was sensible. South's rebid of that awful spade suit was an abomination. He should pass (assuming that 2 was not forcing). North has a problem, but he should probably rebid his hearts.

3 won't be a success, but it is unlikely that it will be doubled.

EDIT: I see that the 2 bid was forcing. North has his bid, but he should continue by bidding 3. South has little choice over 2 but to bid 2 (yuck!). He can't very well introduce his diamond suit. But the result should be the same - North should rebid 3 and that will be the final contract.
0

#3 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,980
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-October-25, 06:57

Partly bad luck, and the rest South.
The overcall is at best sub. min., and
I can only understand 1S if you could not
show the 2-suiter, i.e. a Michales Cue would
have shown the mayor, and now some
share goes to the methods.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#4 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2007-October-25, 07:04

North should rebid 3H. If the partnership is allowed to overcall light, maybe having 2/1 bids by advancer as constructive NF is best.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#5 User is offline   brianshark 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 2006-May-13
  • Location:Dublin
  • Interests:Artificial Intelligence, Computer Games, Satire, Football, Rugby... and Bridge I suppose.

Posted 2007-October-25, 08:42

I'm actually going to give more blame to north than south for the failure to pull to 3 which is the correct bridge decision. The overcall was crap but some people can't pass and it's more partnership style than anything. Plus they can often work out if you find a fit. And the methods are standard enough so I won't blame them either.

Edit: Don't get me wrong, I'll yell at any partner for overcalling a hand like that! In no way do I condone it! ;)
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
0

#6 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2007-October-25, 09:37

Hang south for this 1 Spade bid.
But if this is okd in your partnership, play 2 HEart as nonforcing. Else you will often be in such an awkward situations.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#7 User is offline   vang 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 278
  • Joined: 2004-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Romania
  • Interests:Linux

Posted 2007-October-25, 09:41

methods. play rubens advances.
0

#8 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2007-October-25, 10:17

North should rebid 3, all the more knowing that the 2 rebid doesn't show good spades but just a minimum.

I also agree with the sentiment that it's ok to be able to overcall on these hands (well better than ok) but if you do you want to play a new suit as non-forcing. New suit forcing makes sense if the style is sounder.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#9 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,680
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2007-October-25, 10:21

I will blame the methods.

It's okay to overcall on lousy hands with some shape. And it's okay to play new suits forcing when advancing partner's overcall. But these two things really don't go well together. If you play a style where you overcall on junk, you need some non-forcing responses to get out of overcaller's lousy suit without having to play at the three-level.

Rubens advances are nice too, although they can be abused.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#10 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,398
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2007-October-25, 10:21

Forcing advances fit better with a sound overcall style.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#11 User is offline   Edmunte1 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 593
  • Joined: 2003-October-26
  • Location:Galati, Romania

Posted 2007-October-25, 10:32

1. Overcalling style - just overcalling a 6hcp hand at unfavorable with a bad 5 card suit cannot be winning bridge (not for me at least). Overcalling at this colours should show either a good suit or a decent hand.
2. Response methods, playing new suit as NF or Rubens Advances is much better
0

#12 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2007-October-25, 11:06

jdonn, on Oct 25 2007, 05:17 PM, said:

North should rebid 3, all the more knowing that the 2 rebid doesn't show good spades but just a minimum.

I also agree with the sentiment that it's ok to be able to overcall on these hands (well better than ok) but if you do you want to play a new suit as non-forcing. New suit forcing makes sense if the style is sounder.

Yeah, what he (and most other posters) have said.
0

#13 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-October-25, 11:24

I guess if South pass, his LHO will bid something and pard will butt-in with 2. After this, opps may or may not bid, but in any case you'll have a lesser problem.

After South's 1, there's no reasonable way to stop below the 3 level, though I think North should press on with 3. Rubens advances wouldn't change this much: if North transfers and South accepts, wouldn't you make an invite in 3?
0

#14 User is offline   bid_em_up 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,351
  • Joined: 2006-March-21
  • Location:North Carolina

Posted 2007-October-25, 11:37

I voted methods although I would prefer to give all the blame to South for overcalling this trash vulnerable.
Is the word "pass" not in your vocabulary?
So many experts, not enough X cards.
0

#15 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-October-25, 13:47

vang, on Oct 25 2007, 05:41 PM, said:

methods. play rubens advances.

Agree. Easy stop in 2.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#16 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2007-October-25, 13:56

If I overcall this type of junk (SOUTH), I'm jump overcalling (WEAK) 2. But, I'm not doing that red on white.

Some people do. I think this deal provides one atrgument against. I'm sure there are other arguments for, and solutions, and caveats. I just like 1 overcalls red on white to mean something meaningful.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#17 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-October-25, 14:31

I hate new suit forcing so much after a 1 level overcall, but I guess that's not surprising since I would automatically overcall with this hand.
0

#18 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-October-25, 14:37

I like New Suit Forcing after overcalls, except in a 2/1 situation.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#19 User is offline   dicklont 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 750
  • Joined: 2007-October-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands
  • Interests:Bridge, music, sports

Posted 2007-October-25, 15:21

The South hand is not good enough for a 1 overcall.
--
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
0

#20 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-October-25, 15:46

would N really really pass south's simple trnf completion?

wouldn't S also bid 2 on

AKxxx
Kxx
xxx
qx

?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users