BBO Discussion Forums: Query about Canadian disaster hand - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Query about Canadian disaster hand in Shangai

#1 User is offline   nikos59 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 278
  • Joined: 2003-May-17

Posted 2007-October-09, 13:08

The biggest penalty registered in Shangai (so far at least) was
2300, in the Round 11 match between Canada and Poland.


Scoring: IMP


West North East South
Gierulski Klimowicz Skrzypczak Frukacz



This is an interesting slam hand for EW. But Poland collected 2300 when South played 4H doubled and made one trick after the H8 lead.

Incidentally, the Canadians managed to overcome this huge blow and they went on to win rather comfortably, 40 to 25 although they lost 18 imps here.

Does anyone know (or can ask the players) how the auction went?

TIA
Nikos Sarantakos
0

#2 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,273
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Edinburgh

Posted 2007-October-09, 14:51

nikos59, on Oct 9 2007, 08:08 PM, said:

The biggest penalty registered in Shangai (so far at least) was
2300, in the Round 11 match between Canada and Poland.


Does anyone know (or can ask the players) how the auction went?

I suggest asking the Poles.
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

#3 User is offline   bid_em_up 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,351
  • Joined: 2006-March-21
  • Location:North Carolina

Posted 2007-October-10, 14:49

cardsharp, on Oct 9 2007, 03:51 PM, said:

I suggest asking the Poles.

Yea, 'cause the Canadians really don't want to discuss it!! :) :)
Is the word "pass" not in your vocabulary?
So many experts, not enough X cards.
0

#4 User is offline   brianshark 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 2006-May-13
  • Location:Dublin
  • Interests:Artificial Intelligence, Computer Games, Satire, Football, Rugby... and Bridge I suppose.

Posted 2007-October-11, 07:40

Good defence to take 12 tricks. Declarer missed a club ruff at trick 2 though. :P
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
0

#5 User is offline   MickyB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 2004-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2007-October-11, 08:04

NS play a multi and three-level xfer preempts, I suspect one of those was opened on the North cards.
0

#6 User is offline   jonottawa 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,025
  • Joined: 2003-March-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa, ON

Posted 2007-October-13, 10:22

I believe the auction went 2♦-X-4♥-X-P-P-P
"Maybe we should all get together and buy Kaitlyn a box set of "All in the Family" for Chanukah. Archie didn't think he was a racist, the problem was with all the chinks, dagos, niggers, kikes, etc. ruining the country." ~ barmar
0

#7 User is offline   nikos59 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 278
  • Joined: 2003-May-17

Posted 2007-October-13, 15:27

Thank you Jon for your suggestion; then, South thought 4H was pass/correct
and North took it to mean "to play"?

Anyway, yet another Multi disaster, this time against the perpetrators.
0

#8 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-October-13, 15:33

jonottawa, on Oct 13 2007, 06:22 PM, said:

I believe the auction went 2♦-X-4♥-X-P-P-P

Darn, is it really possible for a pair playing in the BB not having covered this in their agreements?
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#9 User is offline   jonottawa 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,025
  • Joined: 2003-March-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa, ON

Posted 2007-October-14, 15:07

Their agreement of 2♦-P-4♥ was to play, not pass or correct.

See note 11.

http://www.ecatsbridge.com/documents/files...wicz-frukaz.pdf

So while it looks at first blush like Piotr should have known to correct, Wally should have known better than to make such an ambiguous bid.
"Maybe we should all get together and buy Kaitlyn a box set of "All in the Family" for Chanukah. Archie didn't think he was a racist, the problem was with all the chinks, dagos, niggers, kikes, etc. ruining the country." ~ barmar
0

#10 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2007-October-15, 02:19

I believe it's common to play it as "to play" uncontested, but p/c after interference.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#11 User is offline   marcinpu 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 2004-July-05

Posted 2007-October-26, 10:29

cardsharp, on Oct 9 2007, 03:51 PM, said:

nikos59, on Oct 9 2007, 08:08 PM, said:

The biggest penalty registered in Shangai (so far at least) was
2300, in the Round 11 match between Canada and Poland.


Does anyone know (or can ask the players) how the auction went?

I suggest asking the Poles.

It seems like all the players at the table are Poles ;-)
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users