1♦-1♥
1♠-2♣*
2♣: 4th suit forcing.
This kind of bidding makes me wish that xyz becomes standard for everyone, Sadly not yet.
Page 1 of 1
jumps to 3NT after 4sf
#2
Posted 2007-October-21, 01:33
If 1♠ denies the 12-14 balanced: unbal 14-17.
If it doesn't: a balanced 13-14 or the above unbal 14-17.
With more opener would have to dig out some other (natual) bid that passes 2NT.
If it doesn't: a balanced 13-14 or the above unbal 14-17.
With more opener would have to dig out some other (natual) bid that passes 2NT.
#3
Posted 2007-October-21, 02:35
If 2♣ is not game forcing, it shows extra values and clubs well stopped (usually exactly 4153 or 4144).
If 2♣ is game forcing is shows a minimum unsuitable (soft) hand with no interest in slam even opposite a hand that was about to make a slam try.
If 2♣ is game forcing is shows a minimum unsuitable (soft) hand with no interest in slam even opposite a hand that was about to make a slam try.
#4
Posted 2007-October-21, 02:50
Funny, I'd say the opposite of what Frances says. Would you say that a 14-count should bid a NF 2NT, or is it that 1♠ is Walsh in your style? Do you generally apply the principle of fast arrival to notrump bids? Or is it that a non-GF FSF should allow you to stop below 2NT? (I assumed that we play a 15-17 1NT in this poll, the option of a balanced 14-count only makes sence in that context).
I'd say if 2♣ is GF, 3NT is a very descriptive bid, but I'm not sure which one. I have not discussed this with p and it's quite possible that we interpret it differently. My guess would be 4252 with scattered values and just reverse strength.
If 2♣ is not GF, it could be a balanced 14-count or a semi-balanced with 14 or a little more, but maybe some unbalanced hands would bid so as well, depening on which follow-ups after 2♣ would be nonforcing.
I'd say if 2♣ is GF, 3NT is a very descriptive bid, but I'm not sure which one. I have not discussed this with p and it's quite possible that we interpret it differently. My guess would be 4252 with scattered values and just reverse strength.
If 2♣ is not GF, it could be a balanced 14-count or a semi-balanced with 14 or a little more, but maybe some unbalanced hands would bid so as well, depening on which follow-ups after 2♣ would be nonforcing.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
Page 1 of 1

Help
