Page 1 of 1
5161
#1
Posted 2007-October-10, 02:14
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
#2
Posted 2007-October-10, 02:47
I will pass, this hand screams misfit. To be making a game (5♦) I need quite a lot of ♦ from partner to ruff ♠, besides they risk being overruffed.
#3
Posted 2007-October-10, 02:50
It's either pass or 2♦, depending on the mood. Anything else would be over-optimistic.
#4
Posted 2007-October-10, 03:03
I'd pass
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#6
Posted 2007-October-10, 14:18
if the spade x'es are literal (lower than the 7) passing is hard, but I was taught misfits need to pass as soon as possible and if opps bid last, so much the better:)
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#7
Posted 2007-October-10, 14:54
I refuse to answer without knowing the spots.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#8
Posted 2007-October-10, 15:00
Assuming that the x's are low, I bid 2♦. Who knows? Maybe they will bid spades again.
If I had AJ987 of spades, I might pass out 1♠x, but I am allergic to -160. Partner could be 1444 or 0445 for his double, and we have a 10 card diamond fit.
If I had AJ987 of spades, I might pass out 1♠x, but I am allergic to -160. Partner could be 1444 or 0445 for his double, and we have a 10 card diamond fit.
#10
Posted 2007-October-11, 07:13
2♦ for me.
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
#11
Posted 2007-October-11, 08:18
cherdano, on Oct 10 2007, 01:54 PM, said:
I refuse to answer without knowing the spots.
Sorry cant provide that information. this was from the partnership bidding tables, I was on my laptop and I cant find the hand.
Another question for the 1♦ openers - without any interference would you reverse into ♠ over a 1nt from p?
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
#12
Posted 2007-October-18, 10:49
I share the allegy to -160 but -500 I am more allergic to--If we bid, three things can happen and at least two of them are bad:) right now they may well be playing in OUR best strain
#13
Posted 2007-October-18, 12:24
It is possible that partner has a hand that looks very much like mine, but in the rounded suits. However, given the 1♠ bid, I strongly suspect that partner has a few diamonds. So I am not worried about going for 500 in 2♦x.
Page 1 of 1

Help

P (P) 1♦ (1♠)
X (P) ?