Which helps most?
#1
Posted 2007-October-03, 17:45
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#2
Posted 2007-October-03, 18:03
But most of the IMPs and MPs that I lose are related to stupid mistakes that I would not commit when solving puzzles, yet for some obscure reason I do make those mistakes at the table. Not sure what to do about that - would it help to hire a mentor? While in Lake District I found that I played much better than I usually do. I think it was related to being away from work and other stress-causing things, eating better than usual, drinking less coffee, getting physical exercise.
#3
Posted 2007-October-03, 18:20
#4
Posted 2007-October-03, 19:06
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#5
Posted 2007-October-03, 19:09
All others should help.
- hrothgar
#6
Posted 2007-October-03, 19:14
- hrothgar
#7
Posted 2007-October-03, 19:24
#8 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-October-03, 20:19
#9
Posted 2007-October-03, 21:30
For myself, I can see that I definitely start playing better when I've played more hands. I tend to fall out of practice because I go months without playing serious bridge, and I have problems playing serious bridge online/in clubs for various reasons.
#10
Posted 2007-October-03, 21:58
Jlall, on Oct 3 2007, 09:19 PM, said:
I agree about the diminishing returns, but it's a very slow process and obviously playing hands is still valuable. But it's true, I don't find something that I think is new or I never saw before nearly as often as I used to, although when I do I still think it's very cool.
I think books are the most variable, they will help some people immensely and others not at all.
I think playing against weak fields will still improve you, but at a slower rate and you will also develop bad habits that need to be broken.
Something left off the list that I think has helped me a lot - playing in a wide variety of circumstances. I mean getting experience at imps, matchpoints, rubber, money bridge, standard american, 2/1, precision, old partners, young partners, scientific partners, unscientific, playing at night, playing in the morning, playing for long stretches, etc etc etc.
#11
Posted 2007-October-04, 01:43
i'm not very good at this game, so maybe my opinion shouldn't matter... but... Know when to stop. it's dangerous, and in my experience, bad for your game to play past the point at which you either stop caring about the outcomes or are too tired to try to focus. i.e. stop before playing becomes a negative experience.
other than that, prolly playing as many hands as is reasonable and talking to people (that know stuff) about them...
#12
Posted 2007-October-04, 02:32
Second you cab hire a pro an play with him, so you can discuss hands with him later
Agree with Han that those 3 don't look very useful.
I don't like reading books because it is not as good as talking with the experts who wrote them
#14
Posted 2007-October-04, 05:04
#15
Posted 2007-October-04, 05:22
helene_t, on Oct 4 2007, 06:04 AM, said:
silly helene... everyone knows that forum polls are only there to confirm the original posters bids and assign the blame to their p
#16
Posted 2007-October-04, 07:06
Hannie, on Oct 4 2007, 03:09 AM, said:
All others should help.
Learning more conventions and evaluation methods is also not likely to help that much, except if you have yet to learn t/o doubles, Stayman, the LOTT and HCP counting.
As for avoiding weak fields, I'm not quite sure if bad bridge is realy better than no bridge. But if you realize that the field is so weak that you might be better of not playing there, you are probably not susceptible to picking up bad habbits from the opponents.
#17
Posted 2007-October-04, 07:42
awm, on Oct 3 2007, 06:45 PM, said:
Link to the original thread please? This topic holds considerable interest, especially as I'm struggling to concentrate on my reading.
"gwnn" said:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
#18
Posted 2007-October-04, 13:43
This Thread
People gave a lot of suggestions; most of the serious ones are part of this poll.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#20
Posted 2007-October-04, 14:49
When you're at expert level discussing with expert and world class players become more important, and you don't need to play a huge amount of boards. You still need to play enough to not become rusty (how much this is is individual) and preferrably against strong opponents.
Harald

Help
