Page 1 of 1
too strong preempt?
#1
Posted 2007-September-27, 12:26
1st seat RED VS WHITE
xx
AKJT9xx
x
KJx
What do you open?
Your partner hold
AKx
Qx
AKJTx
xxx
What do you bid over a 3H opening bid?
xx
AKJT9xx
x
KJx
What do you open?
Your partner hold
AKx
Qx
AKJTx
xxx
What do you bid over a 3H opening bid?
QJTxx-x-x-Jxxxxx
#2
Posted 2007-September-27, 12:29
OK, I give up. At various parts of the hand, you use the English A, K, Q, J, and T.
But later you have R and V?
But later you have R and V?
#4
Posted 2007-September-27, 13:13
First question: I'd open 1H, is there another possibility?
Second question: With my hand I'd check the backs of the cards. With partner's hand I'd bid 4H.
Second question: With my hand I'd check the backs of the cards. With partner's hand I'd bid 4H.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#6
Posted 2007-September-27, 13:23
Hannie, on Sep 27 2007, 02:13 PM, said:
First question: I'd open 1H, is there another possibility?
I dunno. Based on the other thread, I'd have said that other people would say 4♥ was a possibility.
But 3♥ is right out, even using my caveman methods.
#7
Posted 2007-September-27, 13:28
With MY hand I open 1♥ in 1st seat. No alternative.
With PARTNER'S hand I raise 3♥ to 4♥. Of course these hands and this bidding can't occur in the same deal.
With PARTNER'S hand I raise 3♥ to 4♥. Of course these hands and this bidding can't occur in the same deal.
Kind regards,
Harald
Harald
#8
Posted 2007-September-27, 13:31
With the top hand, open 1♥. While I tend to be sound/conservative with regard to vulnerable preempts, this means that my suit will be good not that I'll have lots of points. A good twelve high is too much for a preempt (maybe if you play namyats that would be okay to bid).
With the bottom hand, over 3♥ opening I bid 4♥. I expect partner to have something like ♥AKTxxxx) and out, or maybe ♥KJT9xxx and out if very minimum. Either of these gives play for 4♥ (need partner to have doubleton club on the second hand, or opps to lead the wrong suit). While a slam is marginally possible opposite a normal 3♥ opening, you need a real maximum with a club singleton, which seems like a lot to hope for. There is a case for making a control ask if you play some sort of control asks which let you out at 4♥ (with one regular partner I would use 3♠ as a control ask here with opener bidding 4♣ to show 2nd round club control in response, after which I could try keycard, but those methods are quite non-standard).
With the bottom hand, over 3♥ opening I bid 4♥. I expect partner to have something like ♥AKTxxxx) and out, or maybe ♥KJT9xxx and out if very minimum. Either of these gives play for 4♥ (need partner to have doubleton club on the second hand, or opps to lead the wrong suit). While a slam is marginally possible opposite a normal 3♥ opening, you need a real maximum with a club singleton, which seems like a lot to hope for. There is a case for making a control ask if you play some sort of control asks which let you out at 4♥ (with one regular partner I would use 3♠ as a control ask here with opener bidding 4♣ to show 2nd round club control in response, after which I could try keycard, but those methods are quite non-standard).
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#9
Posted 2007-September-27, 18:48
The opening hand is too strong to preempt and I and most others would open it 1♥ even if the K of ♣ were the Q.
Opposite a normal Red vs White 3♥ the dummy is very fine, but doesn't rate to make slam very often so lacking means to find out about the ♣ control and stop in game, I'd just bid 4♥
Opposite a normal Red vs White 3♥ the dummy is very fine, but doesn't rate to make slam very often so lacking means to find out about the ♣ control and stop in game, I'd just bid 4♥
#10
Posted 2007-September-30, 12:05
first question:
open 1♥
second question:
I play 4♣ as Control Asking Bid,the answer will be:4♦=no control;4♥=second round control(King or Singleton);4♠=first round control(Ace or Void)
open 1♥
second question:
I play 4♣ as Control Asking Bid,the answer will be:4♦=no control;4♥=second round control(King or Singleton);4♠=first round control(Ace or Void)
#11
Posted 2007-September-30, 13:58
1. Open 1 or 4♥, depending on tactical conditions.
2. Obvious raise to 4...
2. Obvious raise to 4...
#12
Posted 2007-September-30, 14:07
I'd also open 1♥.
I like the idea of saving spade with a 3♠ asking bid. I'd like the slam opposite AK-seventh and a stiff club, a lot.
With my technique of using 4♣ for that call, I have a problem. Red-v-White should feature two top honors, but I might catch the death hand of 2713 pattern. A 4♦ rebid will not be a problem, nor will 4♥. The question, then, is whether a 4♠ rebid with a stiff spade and having three clubs and getting a club lead is more likely than the 4NT response showing the all-important stiff club.
I'm gambling. 4♣.
Of course, this auction is NOT suggested by the actual hands, as the actual hands are silly, IMO.
I like the idea of saving spade with a 3♠ asking bid. I'd like the slam opposite AK-seventh and a stiff club, a lot.
With my technique of using 4♣ for that call, I have a problem. Red-v-White should feature two top honors, but I might catch the death hand of 2713 pattern. A 4♦ rebid will not be a problem, nor will 4♥. The question, then, is whether a 4♠ rebid with a stiff spade and having three clubs and getting a club lead is more likely than the 4NT response showing the all-important stiff club.
I'm gambling. 4♣.
Of course, this auction is NOT suggested by the actual hands, as the actual hands are silly, IMO.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
Page 1 of 1

Help
