BBO Discussion Forums: too strong preempt? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

too strong preempt?

#1 User is offline   tomb3113 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 2007-September-27

Posted 2007-September-27, 12:26

1st seat RED VS WHITE

xx
AKJT9xx
x
KJx

What do you open?

Your partner hold

AKx
Qx
AKJTx
xxx

What do you bid over a 3H opening bid?
QJTxx-x-x-Jxxxxx
0

#2 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-September-27, 12:29

OK, I give up. At various parts of the hand, you use the English A, K, Q, J, and T.
But later you have R and V?
0

#3 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-September-27, 12:33

Maybe the deck is bilingual.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#4 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-September-27, 13:13

First question: I'd open 1H, is there another possibility?

Second question: With my hand I'd check the backs of the cards. With partner's hand I'd bid 4H.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#5 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2007-September-27, 13:18

Wait... I opened 3 with that hand? Ridiculous.
Kevin Fay
0

#6 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-September-27, 13:23

Hannie, on Sep 27 2007, 02:13 PM, said:

First question: I'd open 1H, is there another possibility?

I dunno. Based on the other thread, I'd have said that other people would say 4 was a possibility.

But 3 is right out, even using my caveman methods.
0

#7 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-September-27, 13:28

With MY hand I open 1 in 1st seat. No alternative.

With PARTNER'S hand I raise 3 to 4. Of course these hands and this bidding can't occur in the same deal.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#8 User is online   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,715
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2007-September-27, 13:31

With the top hand, open 1. While I tend to be sound/conservative with regard to vulnerable preempts, this means that my suit will be good not that I'll have lots of points. A good twelve high is too much for a preempt (maybe if you play namyats that would be okay to bid).

With the bottom hand, over 3 opening I bid 4. I expect partner to have something like AKTxxxx) and out, or maybe KJT9xxx and out if very minimum. Either of these gives play for 4 (need partner to have doubleton club on the second hand, or opps to lead the wrong suit). While a slam is marginally possible opposite a normal 3 opening, you need a real maximum with a club singleton, which seems like a lot to hope for. There is a case for making a control ask if you play some sort of control asks which let you out at 4 (with one regular partner I would use 3 as a control ask here with opener bidding 4 to show 2nd round club control in response, after which I could try keycard, but those methods are quite non-standard).
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#9 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2007-September-27, 18:48

The opening hand is too strong to preempt and I and most others would open it 1 even if the K of were the Q.

Opposite a normal Red vs White 3 the dummy is very fine, but doesn't rate to make slam very often so lacking means to find out about the control and stop in game, I'd just bid 4
0

#10 User is offline   zhs1971 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 13
  • Joined: 2005-August-08

Posted 2007-September-30, 12:05

first question:
open 1

second question:
I play 4 as “Control Asking Bid”,the answer will be:4=no control;4=second round control(King or Singleton);4=first round control(Ace or Void)
0

#11 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-September-30, 13:58

1. Open 1 or 4, depending on tactical conditions.
2. Obvious raise to 4...
0

#12 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2007-September-30, 14:07

I'd also open 1.

I like the idea of saving spade with a 3 asking bid. I'd like the slam opposite AK-seventh and a stiff club, a lot.

With my technique of using 4 for that call, I have a problem. Red-v-White should feature two top honors, but I might catch the death hand of 2713 pattern. A 4 rebid will not be a problem, nor will 4. The question, then, is whether a 4 rebid with a stiff spade and having three clubs and getting a club lead is more likely than the 4NT response showing the all-important stiff club.

I'm gambling. 4.

Of course, this auction is NOT suggested by the actual hands, as the actual hands are silly, IMO.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users