No special agreements.
competitive decision
#1
Posted 2007-September-21, 22:51
No special agreements.
#3
Posted 2007-September-21, 23:20
#4
Posted 2007-September-21, 23:40
mikeh, on Sep 22 2007, 12:20 AM, said:
to lead a.....?
btw why are there no votes for pass in the poll? hanging chads?
#5
Posted 2007-September-21, 23:43
- hrothgar
#6
Posted 2007-September-23, 05:31
jdonn, on Sep 22 2007, 07:40 AM, said:
mikeh, on Sep 22 2007, 12:20 AM, said:
to lead a.....?
To avoid a spade lead I'd guess.
Harald
#7
Posted 2007-September-23, 05:32
Hannie, on Sep 22 2007, 07:43 AM, said:
5♣ of course COULD be the winning action, but I'm with Justin and Mike here; pass is the odds on action.
Harald
#8
Posted 2007-September-23, 06:46
If so, I take out partner's take out doubles.
What to, is not clear. If partner has KQx of spades, I bid 4S, if not I bid 5C
Unfortunately, lacking x-ray specs I have to guess, and so I guess 5C.
#9
Posted 2007-September-23, 07:06
What else?
For whats it worth, double is just
showing values / power.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#10
Posted 2007-September-23, 07:07
Did 1♠ show five? In that case I pass since p might have bid 4♠ with three spades. If 1♠ showed four, I bid 4♠.
#11
Posted 2007-September-23, 07:22
I don't want to be declarer, so I'll risk partner's choice (that's why pass is so sensible!)
#12
Posted 2007-September-23, 09:59
They are vul and lets hope we get them down 2 which is a better shot than gambling on 5m (noting if PD wanted to play 4♠ and had 3 card support he'd bid it).
Pass should win more IMPs in the long run, IMHO .. neilkaz ..
#13 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-September-23, 13:15
mr1303, on Sep 23 2007, 07:46 AM, said:
If so, I take out partner's take out doubles.
lol. You really think the last statement applies at the 4 level? It should be pretty obvious simply from a common sense point of view that most takeout Xs at the 4 level are left in. That's not to say that passing here is clearly right but if your reasoning for pulling it is "I take out takeout Xs" then that is really silly.
#14
Posted 2007-September-23, 23:43
A typical hand for partner would be a 2NT rebid with three ♥ and two or three ♠:
Qx
AQx
AK10xx
Kxx
4♥ is sure to go down 2 or 3, but our game is thin.
KQx
Axx
KQ109
KJ10x
This could be the disaster hand. We make 4 or 5 ♠. They might make 4♥ with two black singletons. A secondary 4 card ♣ fit with 3♠ makes bidding on correct. What are the odds of that versus all other possible distributions?
#15
Posted 2007-September-24, 05:26
I agree with everything Helene said and would bid 4♠.
#16
Posted 2007-September-24, 09:13
- hrothgar
#17
Posted 2007-September-24, 09:15
- hrothgar
#19
Posted 2007-September-24, 09:52
Fluffy, on Sep 24 2007, 10:51 AM, said:
Yes. I assume negative doubles are standard, but sorry I should have mentioned it to begin with.

Help

P P 1♦ 1♥
1♠ 4♥ DBL P
?