BBO Discussion Forums: Funny Hand - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Funny Hand

#1 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2007-September-21, 13:06

Scoring: MP

(1♦)-Dbl-(P)-P
(1♠)-Dbl-(P)-?


Seems right to sit for the first double, but what now?
Kevin Fay
0

#2 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-September-21, 13:06

2D now is fine
0

#3 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-September-21, 13:45

kfay, on Sep 21 2007, 02:06 PM, said:

Seems right to sit for the first double, but what now?

Are you really going to let a 3 card opening keep you out of your 9 card fit?

2♦ seems pretty clear to me. Not sure how much stronger I'd need to be to bid more. Doesn't seem like much.
0

#4 User is online   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,022
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2007-September-21, 13:46

Jlall, on Sep 21 2007, 02:06 PM, said:

2D now is fine

agreed: I'd go further and say 'no second choice'. Okay, 3♦... but i'd need KQ1098xx with my side Ace to make that bid.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#5 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-September-21, 13:53

Agree with 2♦. The spade wastage rules out game tries.
0

#6 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-September-21, 14:20

2♦. 1♠ is a little weird; if LHO had a 4=4=3=2, I'd expect an SOS. And if LHO had a 5-6, I'd expect LHO to sit. I'm putting LHO on a 4=1=4=4 or a 4=2=4=3.

Like the others, 2♦ is clear. We can't pass with a stiff spade and we can't jump with this 7 count.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#7 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2007-September-21, 14:22

I forgot to mention you're playing with a fair partner against a couple of dubs. Probably has never heard the term SOS outside of 'Titanic'.
Kevin Fay
0

#8 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2007-September-21, 14:27

The rest of this problem is pretty mundane, I think. I bid 2♦ at the table and P bid 3♣ so I bid 3NT.

Scoring: MP

Lead: Low ♠

Kevin Fay
0

#9 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-September-21, 15:12

After you penalized 1♦ and bid 2♦ over the second double it seems outlandish to take another bid with the norht hand, which was pretty well dexcribed by the two doubles. Not that 3NT is a bad contract though.
Kind regards,
Harald
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users