BBO Discussion Forums: Spades and hearts rebid - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Spades and hearts rebid

#41 User is offline   keylime 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: FD TEAM
  • Posts: 2,735
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nashville, TN
  • Interests:Motorsports, cricket, disc golf, and of course - bridge. :-)

  Posted 2007-September-12, 09:27

1. 2H, even with my forcing club mentality screaming at me to bid 3H (I open a forcing club and hope the opps don't bury me - 3 suiters are not fun for us). The reasoning is very simple - if pard is on the lower range of his NT, 5-7, they likely have club honors which doesn't amount to a hill of beans with your super hand. If pard takes preference back to 2S, then you have the chance to bid 3D to pattern out and still show extras. Also, pard may have a 10-11 hand with 4 hearts too and thusly you need to give pard a chance. It's a good hand, yes, but don't hang pard for making their forcing NT response on xx xxx xxx KQxxx.

2. Also 2H; pard will give preference in spades. May also be your best fit versus an awkward 6-1. Berkowitz-themed hand here.
"Champions aren't made in gyms, champions are made from something they have deep inside them - a desire, a dream, a vision. They have to have last-minute stamina, they have to be a little faster, they have to have the skill and the will. But the will must be stronger than the skill. " - M. Ali
0

#42 User is offline   ycos 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 40
  • Joined: 2007-May-14

Posted 2007-September-13, 00:03

Maybe the 2(not 1) openning rezolve the problem of first deal.
0

#43 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2007-September-13, 00:20

Why are you using the possibility of a slam in diamonds as a reason to jump shift, it is a reason NOT to jump shift as that makes it impossible to get to diamonds if partner rebids 3NT. Unless you are bidding 4 over 3NT in which case you have overbid on a 17 count, wasted a level of bidding space, and made it impossible to ever play 3NT any more.

Yes 2 is very wide ranging. That is MUCH better than having 3 be wide ranging, as you have an extra level to sort it out, and can play a partscore when partner is weak.

And Kxxxx AKxx xx xx is not an opening hand by any normal standards. I would not open Kxxxx AKxx Jx xx, and consider the pass normal (but would open that hand with improved spade spots, which frankly is still a light opening bid.) So 2 is not quite as wide as you are making it out to be.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#44 User is offline   Walddk 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,190
  • Joined: 2003-September-30
  • Location:London, England
  • Interests:Cricket

Posted 2007-September-13, 03:17

ochinko, on Sep 12 2007, 03:49 PM, said:

Obviously I am missing something here as it seems like most experts are unanimous that with both hands the normal rebid is 2. I am a bit disappointed that very little reasoning was presented.

The hand is powerful, but only if we have a fit. None is guaranteed after 1NT, and that's why it's no game force at this point. If you are afraid of missing a diamond slam, the only certain way to miss it is to rebid 3. 4 by responder would not be natural as most people play it.

If you rebid 2, however, there is still a chance that the diamond fit is located. Am I worried about missing a major suit game if I rebid 2? No, responder will always support hearts with four, and if he has an invitational hand with three spades, his next bid will be 3.

Many tend to add distributional points too early in the auction. In my view it's a good idea to wait until a fit has been established (if ever). This is a 17 count, a medium opening hand, and it remains a 17 count if we don't have a fit.

If we end up in notrumps or in spades/hearts on 5-2/4-3, you can throw distributional points out of the window.

As an example, the actual hand needs Q instead of one of the small ones to make it a jump shift (game force) in my book. Even then game is by no means certain, but you will go for it regardless.

Roland
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice
0

#45 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-September-13, 11:10

jdonn, on Sep 13 2007, 01:20 AM, said:

Yes 2 is very wide ranging. That is MUCH better than having 3 be wide ranging, as you have an extra level to sort it out, and can play a partscore when partner is weak.

Good point imo.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users