Hold this hand right now
#1
Posted 2007-September-02, 00:21
Partner deals, both vul at imps.
1♥ (2♦) to you.
Go.
#2
Posted 2007-September-02, 00:52
More interesting is what to do over partner's balancing double, since 2♥/3♣ don't quite seem to do justice to this hand. It seems like 3♥ should show something like this hand type in that sequence.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#3 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-September-02, 02:06
awm, on Sep 2 2007, 01:52 AM, said:
More interesting is what to do over partner's balancing double
This is a good reason why passing is not the answer to our problems. We will have to jump or cue on the next round and even then nothing is very descriptive.
Not to mention that your hand is so strong that partner will pass out 2D with hands that can make 3N or even 4H (xxx KQxxxx AJ Kx is a normal looking pass).
#4
Posted 2007-September-02, 02:38
nickf
sydney
#5
Posted 2007-September-02, 02:38
#6
Posted 2007-September-02, 04:21
1) If partner only promises a 5 card h suit with balanced 11?
2) If partner only promises a 5 card h suit with balanced 14?
#7
Posted 2007-September-02, 08:13
jdonn, on Sep 2 2007, 02:21 AM, said:
Partner deals, both vul at imps.
1♥ (2♦) to you.
Go.
I'd bid 2♥
#8
Posted 2007-September-02, 08:16
Peter
#9
Posted 2007-September-02, 08:29
If we don't play something like that, and pass followed by 3♣ could be bid on anything from a zero count up to, but not including, a good invite (I'd GF with that) I have to act now. I don't like the bid at all, but if you have to, you just have to. 2♥.
I can't bid 3♣. It might not be defined as a GF fore everyone, but in practise it'll work like that anyway. And I'm not strong enough for that versus a minimum opener unless partner have extremely sound openings, which my partner usually haven't.
Harald
#10
Posted 2007-September-02, 09:42
This is as good as 10 HCPs get. It's really worth 11+ imo. So, awkward as it is, 3♣ looks like the best call to me.
#11
Posted 2007-September-02, 10:17
If partner rebids 2♥ over my double, I'll raise to 3; If 3♠, I'll bid 4♥, hoping he gets the picture. If not, I'll ask forgiveness.
#12
Posted 2007-September-02, 12:32
#13
Posted 2007-September-02, 12:40
The available lies after passing are worse than a direct 2H imo.
- hrothgar
#14
Posted 2007-September-02, 13:00
I guess partner will just pass with a balanced 13 or less and not reopen.
If you bid it seems 2H is the least of all evils.
#15
Posted 2007-September-02, 13:04
- hrothgar
#16
Posted 2007-September-02, 14:15
BebopKid (Bryan Lee Williams)
"I've practiced meditation most of my life. It's better than sitting around doing nothing."
(Tom Sims, from topfive.com)
♦♦♦♦♦♦
#17
Posted 2007-September-02, 14:48
2♥ is practical I think.
#18
Posted 2007-September-02, 15:23
Hannie, on Sep 2 2007, 09:04 PM, said:
If you play 2NT as natural in that sequence, you'll have to bid 3♦ IMO.
Harald
#20
Posted 2007-September-02, 16:48
Hannie, on Sep 2 2007, 02:04 PM, said:
IF he reopens, I bid 2H if playing with regular partnership. Partner can still just have a junky 11 pts.
Reopening x does not promise more than 11.

Help
