Echognome, on Aug 20 2007, 05:42 PM, said:
Maybe I don't understand the options after 3NT. Why didn't I bid 4♦ highlighting the club problem?
Ditto that. Plus, 4
♥ took away options for partner. Had you bid 4
♦, if that is allowed (I hope so), then partner could have cue'd 4
♥ to confirm a club control and something. 4
♥ made partner place the contract.
It also seems strange that you do not have any option other than a 3
♥ call. I have what I think to be a really good suggestion here.
Your 2
♥ call is interesting, and I think I might like it. So, after 2NT setting trumps, it seems that you want to focus slow auctions on the 5-4 blacks hand with a 3
♣ call. Maybe the balanced hands always through 3
♦? Then, the highest call (3
♥) for hearts. So, let's expand up a tad.
If I had this start systemically and then tossed in my methods, I'd make 4
♣, 4
♦, and 4
♥ call picture jumps. Each call would show good trumps, meaning two of the top three honors (you have that). Each would show a trick source in my side suit, hearts, meaning three of the top four honors (you have that). When 2
♥ is artificial, the immediate picture jumps show pattern for the most expensive suit (highest ranking in the sense of steps from where you start) -- works here. The 4
♥ call would deny any side control (first or second), this 5422 pattern. The minor calls would deny any honor control on the side but would show a stiff in the minor that you just bid. Amazingly, one call (4
♦) would show this exact hand. Now, I can sit back and let partner decide what to do. (Of course, he now can use weird asking bids -- YumMy TOe's -- in my methods. LOL)
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
1♠ 2♦
2♥ 2NT
3♥ 3NT
4♥ 4♠
?