World Championship prediction thread
#41
Posted 2007-September-29, 12:22
If I were USA2 I would try to maximize my chances of getting to the finals, and then try to win those.
- hrothgar
#42
Posted 2007-September-29, 12:25
cardsharp, on Sep 29 2007, 12:12 PM, said:
skaeran, on Sep 29 2007, 07:08 PM, said:
As I mentioned in my blog, I think this will encourage USA2 to play Italy as soon as possible in the KO stages, given the opportunity. This would give them the best chance of winning the event, which I'm sure is their only thought.
Hmm, I disagree. Your logic (they want to play a match as short as possible against Italy) only makes sense if they believe they are the worse team. They will have the choice only if they did considerably better than Italy in the round robin. Do you really think they would believe they are inferior in that case?
(In fact I doubt this team would ever believe being inferior.)
I would rather guess they will prefer to play Italy as late as possible so that Hemmant have more time to get in tune.
#43
Posted 2007-September-29, 12:30
- hrothgar
#44 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-September-29, 13:36
Interestingly I had this same debate in with Joe in the junior world championships where Poland was generally considered better than us and we were generally considered better than everyone else. Joe thought that if we won the round robin maybe we should pick poland as our opponents since the match would be shorter. I made the point above but of course there were other factors too (poland only played 2 pairs so they were more apt to be tired towards the end and also carryover reasons).
#45
Posted 2007-September-29, 14:53
Jlall, on Sep 30 2007, 07:36 AM, said:
Interestingly I had this same debate in with Joe in the junior world championships where Poland was generally considered better than us and we were generally considered better than everyone else. Joe thought that if we won the round robin maybe we should pick poland as our opponents since the match would be shorter. I made the point above but of course there were other factors too (poland only played 2 pairs so they were more apt to be tired towards the end and also carryover reasons).
In 2005 the Polish Juniors were very tired and it may well have cost them that they effectively played as a four. The won the round-robin well and then only narrowly lost the final in an eight-board playoff after they were tied with USA1 after regulation play.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#46 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-September-29, 16:59
Cascade, on Sep 29 2007, 03:53 PM, said:
Jlall, on Sep 30 2007, 07:36 AM, said:
Interestingly I had this same debate in with Joe in the junior world championships where Poland was generally considered better than us and we were generally considered better than everyone else. Joe thought that if we won the round robin maybe we should pick poland as our opponents since the match would be shorter. I made the point above but of course there were other factors too (poland only played 2 pairs so they were more apt to be tired towards the end and also carryover reasons).
In 2005 the Polish Juniors were very tired and it may well have cost them that they effectively played as a four. The won the round-robin well and then only narrowly lost the final in an eight-board playoff after they were tied with USA1 after regulation play.
The same situation happened the next year too in thailand except this time we won the round robin (and did not pick poland). In fact we thought we might be the favorites in australia (biased of course) but in thailand we clearly were not (they had the same team, we lost our best pair from australia). Anyways sorry for the hijak just thought cardsharps comment was interesting.
#47
Posted 2007-September-29, 18:39
easy, on Sep 29 2007, 08:45 PM, said:
Oops! I wasnt aware but I am still sticking to my prediction.
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
#48
Posted 2007-September-30, 08:56
#49
Posted 2007-September-30, 09:29
USA 1 had a fantastic day scoring 74, which would be a fine score against anyone but for it to include 24 off USA 2, makes it all the better.
Netherlands are the only team without a VP win (they beat Australia by 1 IMP for 15-15), but are tied for 11th.
Unsurprisingly, given the day they had, the USA 1 pairs rank 1st, 2nd, and 10th in the butler ranking of individual pairs.
#50
Posted 2007-October-02, 02:48
15 of 17 predict Italy wins the Bowl, one USA 2 homer call and one hopeful Norwegian who kindly put Netherlands in 2nd, rerun of the 1993 final.
Finalists after Italy:
7x USA 2
3x USA 1
2x Netherlands
2x China
1x Poland
VC Won:
4x France
3x USA 1
2x Netherlands
2x Germany
1x China
1x England
SB Won:
6x USA 2
3x USA 1
3x Poland
1x Indonesia (me)
#51
Posted 2007-October-02, 07:29
Quote
*ahem* Not simply a homer call! As I said in my post, why pick Italy like everyone else? If USA2 won, I'd look like a genius.
Also note my stunning integrity... I did not waver from my pick even when the news came that Soloway wouldn't be making the trip (meaning no offense to Jlall's pop, of course). Integrity.
Of course, I'm also looking like a huge loser. But I'm used to this, especially re: bridge.
Good luck to one and all... And thanks for running this, Gerben!
#52
Posted 2007-October-08, 04:52
In the VC, most got at least 6, some got 7.
Nigel Guthrie got 7 of the Senior's QFists right.
All in all, Edmunte is ahead at the QF stage, 38 points.
************
Included the QF results now, ahead with 48 points... Harald Skaeran, and looking strong since he picked Netherlands & Norway as finalists, one of which will for sure be there (and the others all have Italy wrong).
Leading in the Bermuda Bowl so far is Roland Wald (24), Aberlour in the Venice Cup (22), Harald and I in the Senior's Bowl (9)
#53
Posted 2007-October-08, 06:19
Who expected Italy to be knocked out so soon?
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
#54
Posted 2007-October-10, 06:52
1. Harald Skaeran, 58
2. Roland Wald, 56
3 - 5. Paul Gipson, Edmunte, Dluxe, 52
No other players can win at this point.
Ahead in the Bermuda Bowl is Roland Wald but Harald will overtake him if Norway wins.
Ahead in the Venice Cup are Paul Gipson and Aberlour. Paul will win this if USA wins, Dluxe will win this if Germany wins.
Ahead in the Senior's Bowl are Nigel and I, but we disagree on the winner.
#55
Posted 2007-October-13, 02:19
Great faith in your fellow countrymen!
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
#56
Posted 2007-October-14, 09:21
Gerben42, on Oct 10 2007, 02:52 PM, said:
I am delighted that he did!
Roland
#57
Posted 2007-October-15, 01:48
1. Harald: 70
2/3. Paul: 64
2/3. Ed: 64
4/5. Dluxe: 56
4/5. Roland: 56
BEST IN EACH COMPETITION:
Bermuda Bowl: Harald
Venice Cup: Paul
Seniors Bowl: Nigel
Edit I pasted the wrong line in my Excel-chart - Thanks to Paul for pointing this out
This post has been edited by Gerben42: 2007-October-15, 04:52
#58
Posted 2007-October-15, 07:39
Congrats to the Harald for the win.
Quote
4/5. Dluxe: 56
I suspect this will be the pinnacle of my achievements in bridge. I just won't tell people that it was a pick 'em pool.
Thanks everyone... It was fun!