Overcalling 4 card suits NV
#1
Posted 2007-August-13, 16:28
KJxx..x....xxxx...xxxx
One spade here?
#2
Posted 2007-August-13, 16:34
That being said, many years ago, my parents taught me that you needed Q10+ to overcall. Maybe that makes sense for the bid-on-any-excuse folks...
-P.J. Painter.
#3
Posted 2007-August-13, 16:35
I overcall on 4 card suits at the one level, but this suit and this hand both suck. I need for both of them not to suck.
Some might consider KJ43 to be a "non-suck" but I'm not one of them.
#4
Posted 2007-August-13, 16:44
ralph23, on Aug 13 2007, 05:35 PM, said:
I'd say that KJxx is so much of a "non-suck" that it blows.
-P.J. Painter.
#8
Posted 2007-August-13, 19:32
#9
Posted 2007-August-13, 19:41
But then, I don't mind playing with weirdos who overcall 1S over 1C with KJ9x xx xxx Kxxx white on red.bbb
#10
Posted 2007-August-13, 23:51
I used a K10xx standard with a range of 3-13HCP 'taken' directly from an Italian bridge system book(Blue Team?) several decades ago. We also played 'off shape' doubles in the Italian style.
A 4 card overcall should be make on the same type hand when Vul. or non vul.
playing my current style. It tends to be a good suit and an opening bid that has a 'flaw' for making a takeout double.
If you play random 4+ overcalls in 4 card suits, that KJxx fills the bill, however, it is not my current style.
Regards,
Robert
#11
Posted 2007-August-14, 00:38
So AKxx xx xxx Kxxx is about a min 1S over 1m overcall for me.
Advancer always assumes you have 5-cards and may preemptive jump raise with 4-card support.
Justin, KQJx and out. Is that really your style or are you joking?
#12
Posted 2007-August-14, 01:28
#13
Posted 2007-August-14, 04:09
#14
Posted 2007-August-14, 06:25
The thought of calling 1♠ on this hand would never cross my head. WAY too weak. The idea of preempting 2♠ did cross my mind. However, I don't think that i would ever (actually) perpetrate such a bid.
Free raises a valuable point about the amount of bidding space that one will consume.
Here is a representative example of a (minimum) hand where I would give serious consideration to a white versus red overcall of the opponents 1♣ opening.
♠ KT82
♥ 753
♦ KJT2
♣ 32
#15
Posted 2007-August-14, 06:30
#16
Posted 2007-August-14, 06:45
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
#17
Posted 2007-August-14, 06:52
#18
Posted 2007-August-14, 07:32
#19 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-August-14, 10:04
SoTired, on Aug 14 2007, 01:38 AM, said:
Depends on partner, opps, field, etc, but yes I would often do this.
#20
Posted 2007-August-14, 10:13
Jlall, on Aug 14 2007, 11:04 AM, said:
SoTired, on Aug 14 2007, 01:38 AM, said:
Depends on partner, opps, field, etc, but yes I would often do this.
Justin, I assume you would also bid 1♠ on a much better hand?
Doesn't such a wide ranging overcall range cause problems for your pard?
I don't know much about what is used outside the USA. I see mention of the Italian style where an overcall shows 3-13 HCP. Do all 3 pairs on the Italian team use this?

Help
