BBO Discussion Forums: LMP, session 4 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

LMP, session 4

#1 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-July-27, 17:55

We are south this session.

1. KQJ109542Q84K6, N dealer, unfavorable.

1C - 1S
2D - 3S
3NT - ??

Over the reverse, 2S would have been non-forcing (not showing extra length), and 2H would be an artificial GF.

2. JKQJ52AK4K974, W dealer, none.

You open 1H and... Oops!

Your out-of-turn bid is not accepted and partner is barred from the auction.

It goes (p) - p - (1C) - ??

The 1C bid was extremely slow.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#2 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-July-27, 18:14

I don't recognize either of these.

1. Whatever my blackwood agreement is here. 4N should be KC for spades after my 3 call.

2. Guessing. I'll try 4 and live with it.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#3 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-July-28, 10:28

1) 4C, obviously GERBER (ok ok, cuebidding for spades). I'm willing to stop in 4S after 4D-4H-4S.

2) I'm tempted to bid 1H to see if the opponents bid spades (in which case I'll try to play 4H, or maybe pass), or if they don't (in which case I'll try 3N, or pass). If the opponents are clever though it gets very dicey... If I give them a lot of respect I'll just bid 4H, otherwise 1H.
0

#4 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-July-28, 14:12

1. I considered 4C but I thought it was too risky. My partner probably wouldn't take it as Gerber but as clubs. I decided that 4H was safe but no, that got passed out. My partner had 8AK10J975AQJ75, a bit light to my taste. As you can see you should stop in 4S.

We didn't let this board take us down though. We both apologized and I don't think it affected the rest of our game.

2. I guessed 4 and saw my partner table: KQ754A10973106J. WDP!

Righty bid 1C on an 8-count. Surely he was trying to trick me but he shouldn't have done it so slowly.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#5 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-July-28, 14:35

On the first one I would bid 4C, even if partner takes it as clubs, it is not a disaster, if it goes 4C-4H-4S he should pass.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#6 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2007-July-28, 14:44

Hannie, on Jul 28 2007, 03:12 PM, said:

1. I considered 4C but I thought it was too risky. My partner probably wouldn't take it as Gerber but as clubs. I decided that 4H was safe but no, that got passed out. My partner had 8AK10J975AQJ75, a bit light to my taste. As you can see you should stop in 4S.

4 may very well be misunderstood. It might be technically the "right" call, but 4 usually works. 4 cannot be misunderstood, notwithstanding the reality that it was misunderstood.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users