BBO Discussion Forums: Democrats Cave to Warlords - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 5 Pages +
  • « First
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Democrats Cave to Warlords Funding the war party.

#81 User is offline   luke warm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Bridge, poker, politics

Posted 2007-May-28, 14:51

Winstonm, on May 28 2007, 12:10 AM, said:

Quote

i just have such a hard time understanding why your posts (almost all of them) point to america as the culprit,


Simple - it is American foreign policy over the past 50 years that has created the very enemy we fight. In a sense, al-Qaeda can be viewed as a revolutionary force intent on overthrowing the ruling class within their lands - and the ultimate ruler pulling the strings of the puppet is the U.S.

even if that's true, it imo makes for a very poor reason to seemingly side against america in almost all things, at least in those public things you mention... your posts suggest that everything is evil or conspiratorial, and always with america as the evil conspirator

Quote

To believe this war is about bringing freedom and democracy to the middle east is naive to the point of near idolitizing blind faith fed by lunacy - this is nothing more than a battle of wills to see if the U.S. can dominate and impose its will on the region.

you have fallen into a bad habit (again, imo) of stating your personal views as if they were concrete facts... anyone who believes the importation of liberty and democracy is a goal of america is a faith-filled, naive, lunatic... anyone who believes your truth is a reasonable, intelligent student of foreign policy... is that correct?

Quote

That's why no one will give up - to quit the war is to admit that the U.S. can no longer impose its will.  To quit means to admit that 50 years of foreign policy has been wrong.

regardless of our future actions in iraq, it proves nothing about the last 50 years... i personally would have done a lot of things differently, but i know deep down that those actions could have been just as 'right' or 'wrong' as those actually taken
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
0

#82 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,289
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2007-May-28, 17:53

Quote

even if that's true, it imo makes for a very poor reason to seemingly side against america in almost all things, at least in those public things you mention... your posts suggest that everything is evil or conspiratorial, and always with america as the evil conspirator


Hmmm. Curious thinking to me. I am of the viewpoint that you can be very much in support of your country by the very action of pointing out and condemning the wrongful actions of the leaders. To blindly support "America" seems to me a whole lot like the "We were just following orders" Nurermberg defense.

Quote

you have fallen into a bad habit (again, imo) of stating your personal views as if they were concrete facts... anyone who believes the importation of liberty and democracy is a goal of america is a faith-filled, naive, lunatic... anyone who believes your truth is a reasonable, intelligent student of foreign policy... is that correct?


Right you are, Jimmy. I often in my zeal fail to write: IMO. Having agreed with that, I will also point out that it is my opinion that the statement I made has reached rhetorical status and is so incredibly obvious that it takes more work and obfuscation and denial of both evidence and reason to deny its inherent truth rather than simply accept it as fact. To me, it seems indisputable.

Quote

regardless of our future actions in iraq, it proves nothing about the last 50 years... i personally would have done a lot of things differently, but i know deep down that those actions could have been just as 'right' or 'wrong' as those actually taken


I don't grasp why this is so difficult - it is the continuity of actions over that time span that has created our enemies. How you can claim past actions have no bearing on present condition astounds my sensibilities - it's like saying I shot your wife yesterday but today is a whole different day so why have a grudge. According to some (I'll use the Fox copout), we installed the Shah in Iran, we virtually forced Saudi Arabia to allow a permanent U.S. military presence in that country, and we have blindly supported Israel while castigating all enemies of Israel. Actions have consequences - what we have done is to deny the consequences of our own actions and blamed others for creating unwarranted initializing actions. It is not a matter of right or wrong. It is a matter of truthfulness and accepting the consequences of our own behavior. Instead of being truthful and admitting that we have enemies because of our foreign policy, we have to make up initializing attacks based on hatred of our democracy and freedom.

The Jihad was not the beginning of the war; it was a retaliation for the perceived war that we had been waging against Islam since Israel became a state - and it culminated with the presence of U.S. military near Mecca and Medina.

IMHO, of course.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
0

  • 5 Pages +
  • « First
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users