Posted 2007-May-03, 14:47
The usual inference to be drawn from an early pitch is that it is from a 5 card suit: I think there was a good article on this in a BW a few years back.
But, before we leap to the conclusion that RHO has 5♥s, ask yourself what you would pitch from any 4=4=1=4 hands with weak ♥s? Say Q10xx 10xxx x KQxx.
Or what you would pitch from KQxx 10xx x KQ10xx.
You have to discount the '1st suit = 5 cards' by however you weigh these questions.
You might, against indifferent opps, have a clue from the tempo of the pitch... if it were fast, then the odds of the 5 card holding improve (imo), but if it were tortured at all, then there is a high likelihood of the 4=4=1=4 hand and even some of the 4=3=1=5 hand, where he didn't want to discard a potential setting trick from his chunky 5 card suit.
I confess that, in the partial vaccuum of the forum, I'd be likely to cash another ♦ to see what RHO pitched... this gives up on some remote endgame positions against LHO, but I can't see them comng true anyway, and maybe RHO will pitch another ♥: if he began with 5, he may conclude that this is best because the odds are that we are 4=3=2=4 or 3=3=2=5 rather than 3=4=2=4.
If he doesn't pitch another ♥, then I would still want to be at the table against most non-professional players.. but in the continued absence of table factors, I'd go with ♥A, ♥K and see where I am. In other words, while recognizing the legitiamacy of the 5 card suit rule, I don't think the 2-1 odds I get, via a 1st round hook of the 9, overcome the other distributional possibilities
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari