jdonn, on Apr 20 2007, 04:32 PM, said:
Of course knowing what you play is most important at always, but I find this treatment very unusual.
1♣ p 1♥ 1♠ DBL 2♠ p p, with double being a support double, playing a double as penalty here would be extremely strange to say the least, and I don't think you could convince me it's a good idea.
It is possible it is better playing double in this sequence as 'take-out', but having one rule for all these auctions works extremely well (the typical large penalty auction is something like 1S P 1NT P 2D 2H DOUBLE).
However, I don't think I'm losing by playing this double as penalties. Responder didn't want to act over 2S, so responder doesn't have a penalty double of spades, doesn't have game interest values, is unlikely to have five hearts or 5 clubs (unless very minimum). On what hand does opener want to act yet again with a double, rather than bidding (if he is say 3-6 in hearts and clubs)? He's 1345? He can bid 2NT - no need to double to protect partner's putative penalty.
OK, when I say 'penalty' on this auction, it isn't going to be a trump stack: with 4 good spades opener is more likely to have bid NT the previous round that make a support double. But a 3334 18-count or so with a trump trick seems reasonable. Responder can pull with a 1633 5-count (that didn't do a WJS or similar), but the point is that double implies high cards and spade length.