What agreements do you have in these situations to help inform your decision?
Shapely Hand but only one 1st rd control (high level competitive bidding problem)
#1
Posted 2007-April-07, 10:11
What agreements do you have in these situations to help inform your decision?
#2
Posted 2007-April-07, 10:22
gingolia, on Apr 7 2007, 11:11 AM, said:
N E S W
-- -- -- --
3♣ X 6♣ ???
What agreements do you have in these situations to help inform your decision?
Bid what you think you can make.
#3
Posted 2007-April-07, 11:49
I'll bid 6♥. I expect there's a good chance we can make that, but no certainty. If parner has AKxx-Axxx-KQxxx-v, he'll raise to 7. I don't think he'll raise with less.
Harald
#4
Posted 2007-April-07, 11:55
#5
Posted 2007-April-07, 12:49
#6
Posted 2007-April-07, 13:15
gingolia, on Apr 7 2007, 01:49 PM, said:
Congratulate your opponents on a well-judged auction and move on to the next board.
#7
Posted 2007-April-07, 14:18
gingolia, on Apr 7 2007, 12:11 PM, said:
N E S W
-- -- -- --
3♣ X 6♣ ???
What agreements do you have in these situations to help inform your decision?
I have 52 pages in my notes about this auction let me check them
#8
Posted 2007-April-07, 19:07
Seems everyone Us/Them bid within one trick in a close judgment situation.
Well done ALL around. Next hand.
#9
Posted 2007-April-07, 19:14
Apollo81, on Apr 7 2007, 03:18 PM, said:
i am interested in reading the 52 pages in your notes on this ... do you have a link?
#10
Posted 2007-April-07, 20:03
gingolia, on Apr 8 2007, 08:14 AM, said:
Apollo81, on Apr 7 2007, 03:18 PM, said:
i am interested in reading the 52 pages in your notes on this ... do you have a link?
Roflmao.
You asked for that Apollo!
#12
Posted 2007-April-07, 21:56
The_Hog, on Apr 7 2007, 10:03 PM, said:
gingolia, on Apr 8 2007, 08:14 AM, said:
Apollo81, on Apr 7 2007, 03:18 PM, said:
i am interested in reading the 52 pages in your notes on this ... do you have a link?
Roflmao.
You asked for that Apollo!
I guess so =)
#15
Posted 2007-April-08, 06:25
#16
Posted 2007-April-08, 08:36
6H.
50 in both directions means you have
reached parscore, at least nearly,
which seems perfect.
If I loose only 4 IMPS at this deal, I am
happy, it could have been a lot more.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: For whats it worth, the only thing that
may help you a bit is knowledge of your
partner and knowledge about your opponents.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#17
Posted 2007-April-08, 14:50
whereagles, on Apr 8 2007, 05:11 AM, said:
I consider this a big problem. No votes for pass, but I am thinking about it, have no idea.
I do see 90%+ for bidding 6H.
#18
Posted 2007-April-08, 15:29
#19
Posted 2007-April-08, 16:51
Edmunte1, on Apr 8 2007, 04:29 PM, said:
I agree. That is why 6H is mandatory on this deal. If either 6H or 6C makes, you have to bid 6H or lose about 13 to 18 IMPS. If both go down, bidding 6H will turn a 2-3 IMP gain into a 2-3 IMP loss. So you are risking about 4-6 IMPS to insure not losing 13-18 IMPS. Bidding 6H on this hand is a textbook example of taking insurance.
#20
Posted 2007-April-09, 09:14
jchiu, on Apr 8 2007, 04:25 AM, said:
Opponent DID have a black 2-suiter. However, the opponent never considered bidding 7C (otherwise she would have done it to start with).

Help

N E S W
-- -- -- --
3♣ X 6♣ ???