Your bid? I think the opps have stolen the contract.
bid, pass, double?
#1
Posted 2007-March-22, 13:27
Your bid? I think the opps have stolen the contract.
Bridge should be fun!
#6
Posted 2007-March-22, 18:32
- hrothgar
#7
Posted 2007-March-22, 20:51
Why? You never let the opps play in a misfit?
Peter
#8
Posted 2007-March-22, 20:56
pbleighton, on Mar 22 2007, 07:51 PM, said:
Please explain this - what misfit?
Bridge should be fun!
#9
Posted 2007-March-23, 06:57
I should never post after a plane flight
Peter
#10
Posted 2007-March-23, 09:21
So many experts, not enough X cards.
#11 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-March-23, 09:28
bid_em_up, on Mar 23 2007, 10:21 AM, said:
wow, I was with you until that part
#12
Posted 2007-March-23, 09:50
Consider: your ♠ shortage makes it likely that LHO is raising, so that partner will be shut out unless he has a great hand. Consider that a 12 count such as xx AQxxx Kxxx Kx gives a good play for game, and we can see that we really do not want to sit back and allow the opps to steal from us.
And the safety of the 1=2 major shape means that we may survive a 3♥ bid by partner (I am with Justin in that I'd pass 3♥... I'd need to be on steroids to bid 4♥)
#13
Posted 2007-March-23, 09:50
jillybean2, on Mar 22 2007, 02:27 PM, said:
(P) 1♥ (2♠) ?
Your bid? I think the opps have stolen the contract.
I think my choices are:
pass or x or 3d if played nonforcing
I will try x as the most "flexible"
#14
Posted 2007-March-23, 10:04
Jlall, on Mar 23 2007, 10:28 AM, said:
bid_em_up, on Mar 23 2007, 10:21 AM, said:
wow, I was with you until that part
I like the stiff spade. Partner has no wasted values in spades (if he didnt bid 2N). He doesnt have a 4 card minor. He quite likely has 6 hearts. All of this assumes that LHO didn't raise spades.
It's aggressive, yes. But we are vulnerable, and I'm willing to risk it. It also helps that I prefer a sound approach to 2/1 in 1st/2nd seats so partner does not hold a trashy hand.
So many experts, not enough X cards.

Help

(P) 1♥ (2♠) ?