In Wei precision, the 1♣ opening includes 16-21 balanced hands. The 1♦ response shows 0-7.
1♣-(1X)-pass-(pass)
1NT
and
1♣-(pass)-1♦-(1X)
1NT
both show 19-21 since with 16-18 opener can pass.
What about
1♣-(1X)-dbl-(1Y)
1NT?
The double is negative, i.e. either a standard t/o or a somewhat nebolous semipositive (with a semipositive you can also have a penalty pass and in my partnership we play semipositive jump-shifts here so there is some negative inference).
Page 1 of 1
Voluntary 1NT-rebid in precision
#1
Posted 2007-March-04, 03:47
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#2
Posted 2007-March-04, 11:34
I do not play 1♣-(1X)-pass-(pass)-1NT as 19-21. The two possible hands partner can have are....
1. GF vs. a 16 count, hoping that I'll reopen with an X (which he'll convert), or
2. Insufficient to get to game across a 21 count.
So there's not much of a reason for me to make my bid based on hcp.
1NT shows a hand that believes it can make 1NT across a 2 hcp hand, and has sufficient points in their suit that it cannot believe partner was making a penalty pass. I most likely am not even truly balanced- I would rebid 1NT after a 1♠ overcall with this hand: AJTx Ax x AKxxxx. Most truly balanced hands double, regardless of strength.
I suppose, in theory, there is a hand that would pass that auction, but I have yet to have it. In effect, this auction is forcing. I don't think I'm handling this differently than C.C. Wei would.
1♣-(1X)-dbl-(1Y)-1NT?
That to me shows the 19-21. Pass shows the balanced 16-18, as partner will get another bite at the apple.
1. GF vs. a 16 count, hoping that I'll reopen with an X (which he'll convert), or
2. Insufficient to get to game across a 21 count.
So there's not much of a reason for me to make my bid based on hcp.
1NT shows a hand that believes it can make 1NT across a 2 hcp hand, and has sufficient points in their suit that it cannot believe partner was making a penalty pass. I most likely am not even truly balanced- I would rebid 1NT after a 1♠ overcall with this hand: AJTx Ax x AKxxxx. Most truly balanced hands double, regardless of strength.
I suppose, in theory, there is a hand that would pass that auction, but I have yet to have it. In effect, this auction is forcing. I don't think I'm handling this differently than C.C. Wei would.
1♣-(1X)-dbl-(1Y)-1NT?
That to me shows the 19-21. Pass shows the balanced 16-18, as partner will get another bite at the apple.
#3
Posted 2007-March-04, 13:59
Why would you want to pass 1x out with a bal 16-18? Pard isn't always going to bid with 3-4 hcp and you might have a partscore still.
On pass out seat, 1NT should be 16-21. It is only in the direct seat that it should show extras, because then, if you pass, pard, who still has a bid, will infer you have the bal 16-18.
On pass out seat, 1NT should be 16-21. It is only in the direct seat that it should show extras, because then, if you pass, pard, who still has a bid, will infer you have the bal 16-18.
#4
Posted 2007-March-04, 19:08
This depends a bit on your style after overcalls too. If partner would bid on absolutely any hand of 5 or more points unless hoping to penalize, it's not unreasonable to pass the board out when opener has a minimum 16 since you're not that likely to make 1NT and you could easily go down a lot if partner has nothing. In this case I wouldn't go so far as to play 1NT rebid as "19-21" but something like 18-bad 21 seems fairly reasonable (passing with 16-17).
On the other hand, I frequently play that double of 1X is "takeout" and partner would normally pass with less than GF values and the wrong shape for a double. So a fair number of balanced 5-7 point hands also pass, in which case it becomes more reasonable to bid 1NT with 16 in balancing seat.
On the other hand, I frequently play that double of 1X is "takeout" and partner would normally pass with less than GF values and the wrong shape for a double. So a fair number of balanced 5-7 point hands also pass, in which case it becomes more reasonable to bid 1NT with 16 in balancing seat.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
Page 1 of 1

Help
