BBO Discussion Forums: (1NT)-p-(p)-2NT - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

(1NT)-p-(p)-2NT hmm...

#1 User is offline   jim420 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 95
  • Joined: 2007-January-03

Posted 2007-March-02, 00:16

Scoring: IMP

W N E S
- - 1N P
P 2N P ?


How do u interpret this auction (esp that 2N by p) and what's ur subsequent action?
0

#2 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2007-March-02, 00:29

Well with my pd this would show a huge indeterminite 2 suiter. Looking at my hand I'd guess the Majors and so would bid 3S as I have a clear preference. If pd happens to have H and a minor, he will bid the minor at the 4 level. A D bid I would raise to 5. The reason I don't bid 3C is that pd will pass in the very unlikely case that he holds the minors. If he does hold the minors, (or D, see above), I want to be in 5 as my cards are then golden.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#3 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2007-March-02, 02:07

Playing Woolsey or Capp, a direct-seat overcall of 2N shows 5-5 minors. Even if you don't play such a defense, I think it's the most likely interpretation. But it could be different in 4th seat. In any case, he must have some kind of 2-suiter.

I'd bid 3. This won't be the best fit if he has the minors, but that seems unlikely given my own hand. The reason I bid 3 rather than 3 is that if he bids 3 over my 3, I know he has the majors so I can take preference with 3. If he corrected 3 to 3, on the other hand, I wouldn't know what to do.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#4 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-March-02, 14:49

This 2NT would normally show minors, but that looks impossible given the actual hand.
0

#5 User is offline   jim420 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 95
  • Joined: 2007-January-03

Posted 2007-March-02, 19:53

Apollo81, on Mar 3 2007, 04:49 AM, said:

This 2NT would normally show minors, but that looks impossible given the actual hand.

Indeed. This was the actual hand.

Not knowing what this was all about, I passed to minimize the error...

Scoring: IMP

W N E S
- - 1N P
P 2N P P
P

2NN=
+1.3 IMP to EW


Strangely P used 2N as if he was opening! :P

What would you have bid as N?

P.S. The scoreboard was really bizzare for this hand. Almost every kind of partials by NS or EW were attempted... 1NxE-5, 2xxN=, 2E-1, 3N= 2NN= 1N+1...u name it :P but there was no game possible
0

#6 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2007-March-03, 02:39

Jim, your partner is clearly a beginner. North has a X. You would probably pull that to 2D and there the matter would rest.

Btw I don't necessarily agree with Apollo; that treatment, (minors), might be standard in the States, but many here play it as a big indeterminite 2 suiter, Roman style. Personally I think that is more useful.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users