BBO Discussion Forums: handling preempts - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

handling preempts evaluating the hand

#1 User is offline   plaur 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 313
  • Joined: 2005-April-03

Posted 2007-February-14, 20:39

3♣ - p - p - 3♦
p - ?

RHO opens 3♣ in first seat. I was in doubt both at the first and second bidding round B) I am seeking advice on how to make the best decision.
1) Do you agree pass or would you make a takeout double?
2) How do you evaluate the hand when partner bids 3♦ in the takeout seat?
Does vulnerability or form of scoring influence the hand evaluation?
0

#2 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-February-14, 20:43

I think this hand is too light for a takeout double at any form of scoring and any vulnerability, but it isn't far off.

After partner bids 3D I'm forcing to at least 5D. 4♣ seems the best start.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#3 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-February-14, 20:45

Occasionally you will get a bidding problem from hell. Your hand really wants to play 3N, but can't, since there is no intelligent probe available.

The chances of pard having a club honor, or the suit is blocking is pretty good. And if we are off the club suit, we probably aren't making 5♦ anyway. LHO didn't raise, remember?

I'd probably settle for 4♦, which should be a strong move toward 5♦.

But I really want to bid 3N :)
"Phil" on BBO
0

#4 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-February-14, 20:46

edited
"Phil" on BBO
0

#5 User is offline   cinvent77 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 36
  • Joined: 2005-November-12

Posted 2007-February-14, 20:53

Partner is certainly counting on some of our points, so I'm not sure if this hand is worth forcing to 5♦. Would 3♠ be an option? That must be constructive and can hardly show a good spade suit since we didn't follow 3♠ right away. Partner can raise with four, bid 3NT or sign-off in 4♦.
0

#6 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-February-14, 21:05

cinvent77, on Feb 14 2007, 06:53 PM, said:

Partner is certainly counting on some of our points, so I'm not sure if this hand is worth forcing to 5♦. Would 3♠ be an option? That must be constructive and can hardly show a good spade suit since we didn't follow 3♠ right away. Partner can raise with four, bid 3NT or sign-off in 4♦.

Wishful thinking :)

I think 3♠ shows something like: ♠AQJxx, ♥Kxx, ♦xx, ♣xxx
"Phil" on BBO
0

#7 User is offline   firmit 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 263
  • Joined: 2007-January-26

Posted 2007-February-15, 01:24

I'd takeout - anyday.
If partner got some values, he'll show them. If not my next bid is pass ( if his bid is non-forcing ).

Given situation, I'll bid 5♦.
"Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything." William of Ockham (1285-1349)
0

#8 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,219
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-February-15, 01:50

1) Yes, simply ask yourself how you feel, if West makes a Redouble
2) Take away a King and you have an invitation, i.e. simply
bid 4D

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#9 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,401
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-February-15, 03:15

Pass over 3clubs

4D now.....
0

#10 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2007-February-15, 05:48

An initial pass, followed by 4D. I originally thought of 3S, but agree with Phil's comments.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#11 User is offline   cinvent77 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 36
  • Joined: 2005-November-12

Posted 2007-February-15, 14:33

pclayton is right, 3♠ is nonsense!
0

#12 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2007-February-15, 14:48

You have a clear pass over 3♣. What to do next is, well, a crap shoot. But I disagree with Hannie. Partner is balancing and is bidding our combined points. I am not going to get too excited about my 12 hcp. The more I have, the less parner could have. So I am not going to force to 5♦. After all, would you not want partner to bid 3♦ on... x Qxx KQJTxxx xx.

It would seem to 4♦ or perhaps 4♣ both as game tries in diamonds would be enough. With 4♣ being the stronger variety. At matchpoints, I might just pass 3♦ at all other forms I would raise to 4♦ (I don't think this is strong enough for 4♣ game try).
--Ben--

#13 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-February-15, 16:21

I have a queen above expectancy. That's not enough to move on, especially with this unremarkable hand.

Would have dbled initially, though.
0

#14 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-February-15, 19:35

Pass seems like an extreme view. Sure partner can balance light, but he can also just have a 16 count with no other bid (Xing with 16 points will be a recipe for disaster when off shape at the 3 level).

I agree with not GFing, this hand isn't that great for an 11 trick game. 4C seems right, planning to pass 4D.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users