BBO Discussion Forums: pick a game - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

pick a game

Poll: your call? (18 member(s) have cast votes)

your call?

  1. 3NT (9 votes [50.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  2. 4H (8 votes [44.44%])

    Percentage of vote: 44.44%

  3. other (1 votes [5.56%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.56%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2006-October-23, 10:15

KJ
Kx
A1098xx
9xx

V/V, IMPs

1♦-(2♠)-3♥-(p)-?
0

#2 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2006-October-23, 10:33

3NT for me... After a vul 2♠ overcall, my ♠KJ will be of no value in hearts with a ♥ lead. If partner has good ♥ maybe we can score 6♥, 1♠, and tow in a minor. If his hearts are not solid, maybe ♦ will run on a finessee if needed.

The only thing is 3NT can go down a lot on ♣ to Ace and ♠ through you, 4♥ will never be down a ton. That might should factor into the equation as well...
--Ben--

#3 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,022
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2006-October-23, 10:44

Hamman's Rule: 3N.

Seriously, Hamman's Rule is not a mantra (at least, not for me) but my hand will be disappointing in 4♥.. it is possible to construct hands on which 4♥ makes and 3N fails, but you have to work at it.

Ben's comment about a ♣ to RHO's Ace and a ♠ through is an example where both games rate to fail: partner is not likely to hold a stiff ♠, so that lie of the cards has us off the 1st 3 tricks in 4♥ with us still looking for 10 winners, with no late entry to dummy if he needs to ruff ♦s to make them run... and maybe partner has 10xx or 9xx with rho holding 10x etc.

Also, if partner holds an unlikely ♠ control, 4♥ may cause him to become overly optimistic and bid again. 3N has the advantage (usually) of slowing him down.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#4 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,741
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2006-October-23, 10:58

I'd guess that 3NT and 4♥ are roughly equally likely to be right. I'd choose 3NT because:

(1) This may be a hand where right-siding matters.
(2) The lack of spade raise may imply that partner has some length there, a disaster at 4♥.
(3) If I bid 3NT, partner can still correct to 4♥ on some of the hands where it's right, or even suggest diamonds with something of a fit there. If I bid 4♥ we're probably playing in hearts no matter what partner has.
(4) Partner's more likely to hunt for slam if I bid 4♥, which is unlikely to be right opposite my effective 8-count or so with only doubleton support.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#5 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,483
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2006-October-23, 12:10

I would bid 4H, but I think it's very close indeed.
No-one has yet mentioned to upsides to 4H:
- RHO has the SQ (3NT still probably fatal if we can't run 9 tricks)
- partner has SQx (same applies)
- partner has a singleton spade (if RHO has a pile of rubbish with 4 low spades he may well not raise)
- partner has a singleton club (xxx AQxxxx KQx x opposite, though they might lead a spade against 3NT)

I'm not mentioning the downsides to 4H because everyone else already has - I know they are there!
0

#6 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2006-October-23, 12:35

I'd guess 3N...but it's just a guess.
0

#7 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2006-October-23, 14:32

The option I would choose is "leave". :(

Both 3N and 4♥ look pretty ugly. I'd guess 3N makes more of the time, but 4♥ when its wrong has a lower downside. Depends on my mood I guess.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#8 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2006-October-23, 16:34

3NT. Why can't pard have KJx or QJx of diamonds?
0

#9 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2006-October-24, 10:08

I am sort of against giving actual deals on principle, but for those curious:

Partner has ♠Axx ♥A1098xx ♦Qxx ♣Q

Both (expert) tables bid 3NT and received a club lead, down 2.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users