Playing your 3rd aggregate (total points) KO match of the month, you are in second position at love all.
xx
-
Axxx
AKQJ10xx
RHO deals and passes:
P 1C x P
2H ? 6H P
P ?
What do you bid over 2H? (You don't know yet that LHO is likely to bid 6H)
What do you do over 6H?
(p.s. honours count: if you play in clubs you will score +150 for honours)
Page 1 of 1
Aggregate Scoring again Save?
#2
Posted 2006-September-30, 15:18
Tough problem! I feel that at the table I would probably have bid 5♣ and then passed 6♥. I can even see a bid of 3♥ as being a possibility. If I bid 5♣, then I have an easy pass over 6♥. Opponents guessed and they might have guessed incorrectly. I hate taking the last guess here.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
#3
Posted 2006-September-30, 15:43
Unless I know opps are loonies, I'm going to give them credit for their bids. 7♣.
#4
Posted 2006-October-03, 08:13
One vote each way, and no-one else seems to care....
The opponents aren't loonies and in this sort of auction 6H was clearly bid to make. It just seems to be a guess as to whether partner has a trump trick or not, as the ace of diamonds looks certain to be a trick. It's possible that forcing dummy with a club at trick one will make life just slightly too difficult for declarer.
Opponents at our table passed out 6H.
Team-mate bid 7C unilaterally, and hit a very helpful layout:
-350 in one room (-500 less 150 for honours) and +980 in the other.
The opponents aren't loonies and in this sort of auction 6H was clearly bid to make. It just seems to be a guess as to whether partner has a trump trick or not, as the ace of diamonds looks certain to be a trick. It's possible that forcing dummy with a club at trick one will make life just slightly too difficult for declarer.
Opponents at our table passed out 6H.
Team-mate bid 7C unilaterally, and hit a very helpful layout:
-350 in one room (-500 less 150 for honours) and +980 in the other.
#5
Posted 2006-October-03, 09:00
I do care, it's just you have a habit of making your problems too hard
I guess I'm starting off with 4 or 5♣. In theory, the later decision should be a simpler calculation at total points, at least if you ignore the SOTM. At a guess, we will average 4 off in 7♣, maybe slightly less, so we rate to be -600 or so for bidding on, so we should save if they rate to make slam 65%+ of the time. Given that partner hasn't doubled after I've already given away the position of any trumps that he holds, I think it looks right to bid on.
I guess I'm starting off with 4 or 5♣. In theory, the later decision should be a simpler calculation at total points, at least if you ignore the SOTM. At a guess, we will average 4 off in 7♣, maybe slightly less, so we rate to be -600 or so for bidding on, so we should save if they rate to make slam 65%+ of the time. Given that partner hasn't doubled after I've already given away the position of any trumps that he holds, I think it looks right to bid on.
#6
Posted 2006-October-04, 04:10
I do care too, but was away from computer too long...
I had bid 1♣/3♥ and pass. They had make 6 Haert, after any lead, but maybe my pd, knowing that I have solid clubs and a trick outside will sac in 7 club? After all, with Ax,void, Axxx,AKQJxxx I may had opened different?
I had bid 1♣/3♥ and pass. They had make 6 Haert, after any lead, but maybe my pd, knowing that I have solid clubs and a trick outside will sac in 7 club? After all, with Ax,void, Axxx,AKQJxxx I may had opened different?
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Page 1 of 1

Help
