BBO Discussion Forums: Aggregate Scoring again - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Aggregate Scoring again Save?

#1 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,483
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2006-September-30, 13:32

Playing your 3rd aggregate (total points) KO match of the month, you are in second position at love all.

xx
-
Axxx
AKQJ10xx

RHO deals and passes:

P 1C x P
2H ? 6H P
P ?

What do you bid over 2H? (You don't know yet that LHO is likely to bid 6H)
What do you do over 6H?

(p.s. honours count: if you play in clubs you will score +150 for honours)
0

#2 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2006-September-30, 15:18

Tough problem! I feel that at the table I would probably have bid 5♣ and then passed 6♥. I can even see a bid of 3♥ as being a possibility. If I bid 5♣, then I have an easy pass over 6♥. Opponents guessed and they might have guessed incorrectly. I hate taking the last guess here.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#3 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2006-September-30, 15:43

Unless I know opps are loonies, I'm going to give them credit for their bids. 7♣.
0

#4 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,483
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2006-October-03, 08:13

One vote each way, and no-one else seems to care....

The opponents aren't loonies and in this sort of auction 6H was clearly bid to make. It just seems to be a guess as to whether partner has a trump trick or not, as the ace of diamonds looks certain to be a trick. It's possible that forcing dummy with a club at trick one will make life just slightly too difficult for declarer.

Opponents at our table passed out 6H.
Team-mate bid 7C unilaterally, and hit a very helpful layout:



-350 in one room (-500 less 150 for honours) and +980 in the other.
0

#5 User is offline   MickyB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 2004-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2006-October-03, 09:00

I do care, it's just you have a habit of making your problems too hard :)

I guess I'm starting off with 4 or 5♣. In theory, the later decision should be a simpler calculation at total points, at least if you ignore the SOTM. At a guess, we will average 4 off in 7♣, maybe slightly less, so we rate to be -600 or so for bidding on, so we should save if they rate to make slam 65%+ of the time. Given that partner hasn't doubled after I've already given away the position of any trumps that he holds, I think it looks right to bid on.
0

#6 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2006-October-04, 04:10

I do care too, but was away from computer too long...
I had bid 1♣/3♥ and pass. They had make 6 Haert, after any lead, but maybe my pd, knowing that I have solid clubs and a trick outside will sac in 7 club? After all, with Ax,void, Axxx,AKQJxxx I may had opened different?
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users