Posted 2006-September-19, 17:42
1. Yes. There is a lot to be said for an immediate bid of some kind, either a straightforward 5♥ or a psychic 4N, but you have just enough stuff that the vulnerable opps might not be able to balance.
2. 4N should be keycard: there is no reason why it should be anything else... why would east try to improve the contract? Even if you had long ♠s, I'd still treat it as keycard, and your ♠ length strongly suggests that E has a fit, in which case surely he intended it as keycard?
3. I'd bid 5♦ to get the best lead for our side..... I don't mind going down undoubled in 5♦ and I will run to 5♥ if doubled. I have no intention of saving: I am positioning the defence. The opps probably have a source of tricks in ♣, with the Ace hopefully on my right, and I hope to score 2 minor tricks and one major. In that case, I probably need a ♦ lead.. I definitely can't have a ♣ lead.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari