Help
Back to the original question, I would prefer one table from each match as long as comparisons are available from the unshown table. It's not uncommon for one match to be much more interesting than the other, as mis-matches aren't uncommon even in the semi-finals of some events, and I'd rather watch a match with a 10 imp margin than a 110 imp margin when the bridge tends to get a bit silly.
What is your preference for coverage? more tables in play than on VG
#21
- Limit bidder
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 8,482
- Joined: 2004-November-02
- Gender:Female
- Location:England
- Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those
Posted 2006-August-04, 03:07
#22
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,190
- Joined: 2003-September-30
- Location:London, England
- Interests:Cricket
Posted 2006-August-04, 09:07
FrancesHinden, on Aug 4 2006, 11:07 AM, said:
Back to the original question, I would prefer one table from each match as long as comparisons are available from the unshown table. It's not uncommon for one match to be much more interesting than the other, as mis-matches aren't uncommon even in the semi-finals of some events, and I'd rather watch a match with a 10 imp margin than a 110 imp margin when the bridge tends to get a bit silly.
That "problem" is easily solved because you can switch matches at a break point if the current scores dictate it.
Roland
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice