BBO Discussion Forums: Explaining 1M - 4M - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Explaining 1M - 4M

#41 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2006-July-25, 06:08

Perhaps you could say: "to play, ambiguous: high card or shape based".
0

#42 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,483
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2006-July-25, 06:46

awm, on Jul 25 2006, 05:15 AM, said:

The director stated that the correct explanation was "no agreement" without any further elaboration. I found it somewhat unbelievable that this pair (a married couple who had been playing together for many years and accumulated many masterpoints) could feasibly have "no agreement" about a simple two-level jump overcall in a national championship event... but that's what the director said.

Well, I found it suprising over the weekend the extent of the sequences in which Nickell/Freeman seem to have "no agreement".
0

#43 User is offline   kenberg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,277
  • Joined: 2004-September-22
  • Location:Northern Maryland

Posted 2006-July-25, 08:03

FrancesHinden, on Jul 25 2006, 07:46 AM, said:

awm, on Jul 25 2006, 05:15 AM, said:

The director stated that the correct explanation was "no agreement" without any further elaboration.  I found it somewhat unbelievable that this pair (a married couple who had been playing together for many years and accumulated many masterpoints) could feasibly have "no agreement" about a simple two-level jump overcall in a national championship event... but that's what the director said.

Well, I found it suprising over the weekend the extent of the sequences in which Nickell/Freeman seem to have "no agreement".

I often am at least a little suspicious of "no agreement". There are degees of understanding. However, in support of the possibility that it may be so, here is a recent example from my own play:

RHO opened a big club, I bid 1H, LHO passed, partner bid 2C. Hmm. We are a regular partnership and no doubt we should have discussed this but we hadn't. Over a "normal" 1C opening partner's 2C would either be heart support and invitational values (or more) or else a very good hand which he will describe further later. Over a totally artificial club it seems there is good reason to believe it shows clubs. I did not alert, they did not ask. The auction staggered through to some successful end, I was declarer and told the opponents I was not sure of the 2C. They let it be and we managed to play the hand without needing a director. Had they asked, I would have said just what I have said above.


I had decided that it probably did not show clubs, and I guessed right. I think it probably should show clubs, I just guessed that it did not.


Ken
Ken
0

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users