Page 1 of 1
Don't you love leading?
#1
Posted 2006-July-19, 02:56
♠J3
♥KT4
♦A8743
♣Q92
Auction 1♠ p 4♠*
* Opening strength 3+♠ (don't ask...)
To make things worse, your agreed opening lead style is Polish, i.e. 2nd and 4th, low from small doubleton.
Scoring: MP
Opponents: No good
♥KT4
♦A8743
♣Q92
Auction 1♠ p 4♠*
* Opening strength 3+♠ (don't ask...)
To make things worse, your agreed opening lead style is Polish, i.e. 2nd and 4th, low from small doubleton.
Scoring: MP
Opponents: No good
#2
Posted 2006-July-19, 03:07
scoring format?
MP: Trump, passive
IMP: Heart, aggressive
With kind regards
Marlowe
MP: Trump, passive
IMP: Heart, aggressive
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#3
Posted 2006-July-19, 06:41
small ♦, apparently it's the 4...
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#4
Posted 2006-July-19, 06:56
hi
looks to me like a passive lead not only inadequate but hard to determine what is passive!.... if i chose to attack it will be Q♣ ..p doesnt rate to have much and this may protect our club holding .. additionally, as i seem to hold the entries it's possible we find a club ruff if p has the 'magic' Jx holding.
I have to admit i might not actually lead this at the table
)
Rgds Dog
looks to me like a passive lead not only inadequate but hard to determine what is passive!.... if i chose to attack it will be Q♣ ..p doesnt rate to have much and this may protect our club holding .. additionally, as i seem to hold the entries it's possible we find a club ruff if p has the 'magic' Jx holding.
I have to admit i might not actually lead this at the table
Rgds Dog
ManoVerboard
#5
Posted 2006-July-19, 07:07
I find this a difficult problem.
It sounds like pard has at most 5 HCP and could be as few as 2. I think with 0 they might bid more.
Im guessing Trumps are 5-3. If Dummy has 4 trumps with 13 HCP and bids 4S they will miss many slams, unless its a 4-3-3-3 quackish hand.
I'd like to make a passive lead, but I dont see any.
Leading a club or heart can easily give away a trick. Sma efor a Spade as it doesn't sound like they need ruffs.
We want to avoid giving away tricks. If they have the K and Q of dimes plus all their other values we sont set the contract, so aim to score as many tricks as possible.
Because both N and S have many HCP the prohibition of underleading aces is somewhat lifted.
If we underlead the Ace ♦ and Dummy ahs the K and ducks to pards Q and he returns the suit, we may get a 3rd round ruff. That requires both opps be 3-3 in Diamonds.
I don't think thats likely, but we may still score pards Q and our ace and another trick and get a good score holding them to 4.
For the Ace underlead to cost the opps must have a doubleton diamond, win the first trick, and be able to discard a diamond later.
The alternative is Ace and another ♦.
GOOD opps would ask themselves why you are making that lead and suspect you have the missing honors.
I lead the Ace♦ and am prepared for it to be a bad lead. But I think all other leads will be more likely to be bad.
It sounds like pard has at most 5 HCP and could be as few as 2. I think with 0 they might bid more.
Im guessing Trumps are 5-3. If Dummy has 4 trumps with 13 HCP and bids 4S they will miss many slams, unless its a 4-3-3-3 quackish hand.
I'd like to make a passive lead, but I dont see any.
Leading a club or heart can easily give away a trick. Sma efor a Spade as it doesn't sound like they need ruffs.
We want to avoid giving away tricks. If they have the K and Q of dimes plus all their other values we sont set the contract, so aim to score as many tricks as possible.
Because both N and S have many HCP the prohibition of underleading aces is somewhat lifted.
If we underlead the Ace ♦ and Dummy ahs the K and ducks to pards Q and he returns the suit, we may get a 3rd round ruff. That requires both opps be 3-3 in Diamonds.
I don't think thats likely, but we may still score pards Q and our ace and another trick and get a good score holding them to 4.
For the Ace underlead to cost the opps must have a doubleton diamond, win the first trick, and be able to discard a diamond later.
The alternative is Ace and another ♦.
GOOD opps would ask themselves why you are making that lead and suspect you have the missing honors.
I lead the Ace♦ and am prepared for it to be a bad lead. But I think all other leads will be more likely to be bad.
#6
Posted 2006-July-19, 07:12
Whatever the correct lower heart is.
Must admit I would not have given any other lead a thought.
Must admit I would not have given any other lead a thought.
#9
Posted 2006-July-19, 07:50
Quote
♥ 4, auto. Dont know polish thing
I am just stating the agreements. You may of course deviate from those agreements.
#10
Posted 2006-July-19, 08:13
Lead ♥10 seems... oddness to me, not sure about the meaning 
BTW, 'auto' means I dont know where to start, so get to the lazy way
BTW, 'auto' means I dont know where to start, so get to the lazy way
#11
Posted 2006-July-19, 12:49
When in doubt, lead a club (if not leading a trump). Its like Rodney Dangerfield, it gets no respect.
Since I have an honor in the suit, and I (probably) wish for partner to continue this line of attack, I will lead the 2 pretending I have 4, instead of the 9, showing no interest in the suit.
Since I have an honor in the suit, and I (probably) wish for partner to continue this line of attack, I will lead the 2 pretending I have 4, instead of the 9, showing no interest in the suit.
Is the word "pass" not in your vocabulary?
So many experts, not enough X cards.
So many experts, not enough X cards.
#12
Posted 2006-July-20, 02:52
At least no one led ♥K, everything else was chosen at least once so far. Keep voting!
#13
Posted 2006-July-20, 17:24
♠3
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
Page 1 of 1

Help
