i'm a 6♦ bidder also
Big hand, but... Monster!
#21
Posted 2006-June-07, 18:40
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
#22
Posted 2006-June-08, 08:52
sorry, i cannot picture a 1N then 3N hand by partner that does not include at lease the CQ, so I bid 6N
It costs nothing to be nice -- my better half
#23
Posted 2006-June-19, 13:42
Blofeld, on Jun 7 2006, 04:37 AM, said:
This particular combination of suits may well actually be biddable after a 2♣ opening (2♣ : 2♦, 2♥ : blah, 3♦ is the auction I'm thinking of), so I'll go with that.
On the given auction, I think I bid 4♦. But what would 4♠ be here? A fragment? A forcing hand wanting to hear more from partner?
On the given auction, I think I bid 4♦. But what would 4♠ be here? A fragment? A forcing hand wanting to hear more from partner?
I agree with Owen

Help
